These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20978826)

  • 21. Dimensions of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Finland: A cross-sectional population study.
    Salonen AH; Rosenström T; Edgren R; Volberg R; Alho H; Castrén S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 58(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 28247931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence rates of gambling problems in Montreal, Canada: a look at old adults and the role of passion.
    Philippe F; Vallerand RJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 17431750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of a one item screen for problem gambling.
    Rockloff MJ; Ehrich J; Themessl-Huber M; Evans LG
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Dec; 27(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 21210191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: the utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for predicting pathology.
    Lakey CE; Goodie AS; Campbell WK
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 17171543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.
    Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohling ML; Rohde P; Seeley JR
    J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 15353924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
    Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between cultural variables and gambling behavior among Chinese residing in Australia.
    Oei T; Raylu N
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 19730999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
    Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of the problem gambling severity index using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch modelling.
    Miller NV; Currie SR; Hodgins DC; Casey D
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Sep; 22(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24014164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.
    Anselmi P; Colledani D; Andreotti A; Robusto E; Fabbris L; Vian P; Genetti B; Mortali C; Minutillo A; Mastrobattista L; Pacifici R
    Assessment; 2022 Oct; 29(7):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 34036842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
    Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of the Chinese version of the gambling motivation scale (C-GMS).
    Wu AM; Tang CS
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Dec; 27(4):709-24. PubMed ID: 21191635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Older adults' gambling motivation and problem gambling: a comparative study.
    Clarke D
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Jun; 24(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 18273695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comments from the trenches: Proposed Changes to the DSM-V classification of pathological gambling.
    Mitzner GB; Whelan JP; Meyers AW
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Sep; 27(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 20972823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers.
    Kuentzel JG; Henderson MJ; Melville CL
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 18369710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship of problem gambling to criminal behavior in a sample of Canadian male federal offenders.
    Turner NE; Preston DL; Saunders C; McAvoy S; Jain U
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 19241147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties?
    Wulfert E; Hartley J; Lee M; Wang N; Franco C; Sodano R
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 16311880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-T).
    Arcan K; Karanci AN
    J Gambl Stud; 2015 Mar; 31(1):211-24. PubMed ID: 24146305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.