These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20978922)
1. Human-computer interaction in radiotherapy target volume delineation: a prospective, multi-institutional comparison of user input devices. Multi-Institutional Target Delineation in Oncology Group J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 20978922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delineation of vertebral area on the coronal plane using three-dimensional ultrasonography advanced volume contrast imaging (VCI) Omni view: intrarater reliability and agreement using standard mouse, high definition mouse, and pen-tablet. Araujo JĂșnior E; Martinez LH; Simioni C; Martins WP; Nardozza LM; Moron AF J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1818-21. PubMed ID: 22122299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of keyboard, light pen and voice recognition as methods of data input. Murchie CJ; Kenny GN Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1988; 5(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 3241118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability of robotic platforms for remote surgical teleproctoring. Ereso AQ; Garcia P; Tseng E; Dua MM; Victorino GP; Guy LT Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jun; 15(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 19548825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of muscular load and performance in using a pen-tablet system. Kotani K; Horii K J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci; 2003 Mar; 22(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 12672972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. Parker CC; Damyanovich A; Haycocks T; Haider M; Bayley A; Catton CN Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 12648794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the impact of the device used for contouring in saving time and increasing the ease of contouring patients in radiotherapy treatment. Esmati E; Ghalehtaki R; Lashkari M; Babaei M; Saraee A; Mortazavi H; Saraee E J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; 55(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 38431450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Auto-contouring Software Tool for Gross Tumour Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy Planning. Doshi T; Wilson C; Paterson C; Lamb C; James A; MacKenzie K; Soraghan J; Petropoulakis L; Di Caterina G; Grose D Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jan; 29(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 27780693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rectum contouring variability in patients treated for prostate cancer: impact on rectum dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability. Fiorino C; Vavassori V; Sanguineti G; Bianchi C; Cattaneo GM; Piazzolla A; Cozzarini C Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jun; 63(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12142088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving superficial target delineation in radiation therapy with endoscopic tracking and registration. Weersink RA; Qiu J; Hope AJ; Daly MJ; Cho BC; Dacosta RS; Sharpe MB; Breen SL; Chan H; Jaffray DA Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6458-68. PubMed ID: 22149829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Freehand liver volumetry by using an electromagnetic pen tablet: accuracy, precision, and rapidity. Perandini S; Faccioli N; Inama M; Pozzi Mucelli R J Digit Imaging; 2011 Apr; 24(2):360-5. PubMed ID: 20352280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of observer variation using matched CT-PET for lung cancer delineation: a three-dimensional analysis. Steenbakkers RJ; Duppen JC; Fitton I; Deurloo KE; Zijp LJ; Comans EF; Uitterhoeve AL; Rodrigus PT; Kramer GW; Bussink J; De Jaeger K; Belderbos JS; Nowak PJ; van Herk M; Rasch CR Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Feb; 64(2):435-48. PubMed ID: 16198064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study. Barkati M; Simard D; Taussky D; Delouya G J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 26568515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using PET/CT fusion, Part II: the impact of a contouring protocol. Berson AM; Stein NF; Riegel AC; Destian S; Ng T; Tena LB; Mitnick RJ; Heiba S Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 19181253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stylus/tablet user input device for MRI heart wall segmentation: efficiency and ease of use. Taslakian B; Pires A; Halpern D; Babb JS; Axel L Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4586-4597. PubMed ID: 29721687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Cole E; Pisano ED; Clary GJ; Zeng D; Koomen M; Kuzmiak CM; Seo BK; Lee Y; Pavic D Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(10-11):722-9. PubMed ID: 16386460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer tumor vascular parameters by using perfusion CT: influence of tumor region of interest. Goh V; Halligan S; Gharpuray A; Wellsted D; Sundin J; Bartram CI Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 18403621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: Highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest. Roach D; Holloway LC; Jameson MG; Dowling JA; Kennedy A; Greer PB; Krawiec M; Rai R; Denham J; De Leon J; Lim K; Berry ME; White RT; Bydder SA; Tan HT; Croker JD; McGrath A; Matthews J; Smeenk RJ; Ebert MA J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 30609205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet. Main DS; Quintela J; Araya-Guerra R; Holcomb S; Pace WD Ann Fam Med; 2004; 2(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 15506574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]