208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20979467)
1. Resurrection of a stem-cell funding barrier--Dickey-Wicker in court.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2010 Oct; 363(18):1687-9. PubMed ID: 20979467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court battle. What's next for stem cell research?
Kaiser J
Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6001):163. PubMed ID: 20929744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum.
Hatch OG
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House challenges Bush's limits on embryonic-stem-cell research.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2005 Jun; 51(39):A17. PubMed ID: 16018100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An obscure rider obstructing science: the conflation of parthenotes with embryos in the Dickey-Wicker amendment.
Rodriguez S; Campo-Engelstein L; Tingen C; Woodruff T
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 21400380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research funding. Politics and parthenotes.
Tingen C; Rodriguez S; Campo-Engelstein L; Woodruff TK
Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6003):453. PubMed ID: 20966235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Teetering on the brink.
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):987. PubMed ID: 20944563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Science and the law. With stem cells in court, a history primer.
Vogel G; Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5998):1450-1. PubMed ID: 20847238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cells. NIH wins in appeals court, but legal battle continues.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):651. PubMed ID: 21551039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomedical research. A first step in relaxing restrictions on stem cell research.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5920):1412-3. PubMed ID: 19286523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryonic stem cells. Controversial ruling throws U.S. research into a tailspin.
Kaiser J; Vogel G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5996):1132-3. PubMed ID: 20813924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Newhart AB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
Holden C; Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frist's stem cell research views draw praise, incite anger.
Med Health; 2005 Aug; 59(27):6-7. PubMed ID: 16111081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Obama executive order. For Congress and NIH, headaches ahead on stem cells.
Holden C
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1552-3. PubMed ID: 19299595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Goldstein C
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human embryonic stem cell research.
American Thoracic Society Research Advocacy Committee
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 173(9):1043-5. PubMed ID: 16632635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stem-cell lines.
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A dangerous precedent.
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7303):159. PubMed ID: 20613795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
