These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20979775)

  • 1. [Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock].
    Zhang HM; Liu DW; Wang XT; Rui X; Wang H; He HW; Liu Y; Chen XK
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 49(7):610-3. PubMed ID: 20979775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Variability of peripheral arterial peak velocity predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Jiang L; Zhu B; Han W; Zhao Y; Shi Y; Guo F; Xi X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Mar; 30(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29519280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients.
    Xu Q; Yan J; Cai G; Chen J; Li L; Hu C
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24451954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
    Lu N; Xi X; Jiang L; Yang D; Yin K
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1258-1261. PubMed ID: 28363617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
    Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mean arterial pressure as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Qi H; Gu Q; Liu N; Zhang BY
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2013 Jan; 25(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 23611094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
    Perner A; Faber T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
    Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?
    Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
    Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
    Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of stroke volume variation and intrathoracic blood volume index on the responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated canine with hemorrhagic shock].
    Liu SQ; Qiu HB; Yang Y; Chen YM; Li JQ; Shen JF
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 44(17):1216-9. PubMed ID: 17147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
    Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Liu Y; Lu YH; Xie JF; Qiu XH; Dong L; Yang CS; Liu L; Yang Y; Qiu HB
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 49(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21418837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.