107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20979995)
1. Proteomic analysis of endometrium in fertile women during the prereceptive and receptive phases after luteinizing hormone surge.
Li J; Tan Z; Li M; Xia T; Liu P; Yu W
Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):1161-3. PubMed ID: 20979995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated.
Domínguez F; Garrido-Gómez T; López JA; Camafeita E; Quiñonero A; Pellicer A; Simón C
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2607-17. PubMed ID: 19556289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study of altered expression of annexin IV and human endometrial receptivity].
Li J; Tan Z; Li MT; Liu YL; Liu Q; Gu XF; Zhou JZ; Zhuang GL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 41(12):803-5. PubMed ID: 17327107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Label-free proteomics uncovers energy metabolism and focal adhesion regulations responsive for endometrium receptivity.
Chen Q; Zhang A; Yu F; Gao J; Liu Y; Yu C; Zhou H; Xu C
J Proteome Res; 2015 Apr; 14(4):1831-42. PubMed ID: 25728905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of endometrial luminal epithelial surface proteins responsible for embryo implantation.
Ye TM; Pang RT; Leung CO; Chiu JF; Yeung WS
Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):853-61.e3. PubMed ID: 25624195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2D-DiGE analysis of the human endometrial secretome reveals differences between receptive and nonreceptive states in fertile and infertile women.
Hannan NJ; Stephens AN; Rainczuk A; Hincks C; Rombauts LJ; Salamonsen LA
J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6256-64. PubMed ID: 20925431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. iTRAQ-based Proteomic Analysis Unveils ACSL4 as a Novel Potential Regulator of Human Endometrial Receptivity.
Hu S; Sun Z; Li B; Zhao H; Wang Y; Yao G; Li X; Bian X; Li TC; Vankelecom H; Sun Y
Endocrinology; 2023 Jan; 164(3):. PubMed ID: 36652382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity.
Garrido-Gómez T; Quiñonero A; Antúnez O; Díaz-Gimeno P; Bellver J; Simón C; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1957-67. PubMed ID: 25106620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene expression confirms a potentially receptive endometrium identified by histology in fertile women.
Evans GE; Phillipson GT; Sin IL; Frampton CM; Kirker JA; Bigby SM; Evans JJ
Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2747-55. PubMed ID: 22740499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of new biomarkers of human endometrial receptivity in the natural cycle.
Haouzi D; Mahmoud K; Fourar M; Bendhaou K; Dechaud H; De Vos J; Rème T; Dewailly D; Hamamah S
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jan; 24(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 18835874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility.
Altmäe S; Martínez-Conejero JA; Salumets A; Simón C; Horcajadas JA; Stavreus-Evers A
Mol Hum Reprod; 2010 Mar; 16(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 19933690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proteomic analysis of the luteal endometrial secretome.
Scotchie JG; Fritz MA; Mocanu M; Lessey BA; Young SL
Reprod Sci; 2009 Sep; 16(9):883-93. PubMed ID: 19494364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial stromal cell proteome mapping in repeated implantation failure and recurrent pregnancy loss cases and fertile women.
Dhaenens L; Lierman S; De Clerck L; Govaert E; Deforce D; Tilleman K; De Sutter P
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Mar; 38(3):442-454. PubMed ID: 30612956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcriptomic changes during the pre-receptive to receptive transition in human endometrium detected by RNA-Seq.
Hu S; Yao G; Wang Y; Xu H; Ji X; He Y; Zhu Q; Chen Z; Sun Y
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Dec; 99(12):E2744-53. PubMed ID: 25243572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dialogue between blastocyst hCG and endometrial LH/hCG receptor: which role in implantation?
Perrier d'Hauterive S; Berndt S; Tsampalas M; Charlet-Renard C; Dubois M; Bourgain C; Hazout A; Foidart JM; Geenen V
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2007; 64(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 17934312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization alters endometrial receptivity in humans: protocol effects.
Haouzi D; Assou S; Dechanet C; Anahory T; Dechaud H; De Vos J; Hamamah S
Biol Reprod; 2010 Apr; 82(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 20042535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discovery of biomarkers of endometrial receptivity through a minimally invasive approach: a validation study with implications for assisted reproduction.
Chan C; Virtanen C; Winegarden NA; Colgan TJ; Brown TJ; Greenblatt EM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):810-7. PubMed ID: 23725802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcriptomic analysis of endometrial receptivity for a genomic diagnostics model of Chinese women.
Zhang WB; Li Q; Liu H; Chen WJ; Zhang CL; Li H; Lu X; Chen JL; Li L; Wu H; Sun XX
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 33589135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of endometrial receptivity.
Horcajadas JA; Riesewijk A; Domínguez F; Cervero A; Pellicer A; Simón C
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():166-75. PubMed ID: 15731309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of transcriptomic profiles in endometrium during window of implantation between women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage.
Huang J; Qin H; Yang Y; Chen X; Zhang J; Laird S; Wang CC; Chan TF; Li TC
Reproduction; 2017 Jun; 153(6):749-758. PubMed ID: 28283674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
