211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20980129)
41. Mobility of the obturator prosthesis in hemimaxillectomy edentulous patients.
Tsuchiya AM; Ueno T; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 1998 Mar; 45(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 12160242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of maxillectomy patients with immediate versus delayed obturator prosthesis placement.
Lapointe HJ; Lampe HB; Taylor SM
J Otolaryngol; 1996 Oct; 25(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 8902689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction.
Ellis JS; Pelekis ND; Thomason JM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17244306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment.
Levi A; Psoter WJ; Agar JR; Reisine ST; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 12608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A simplified technique for construction of an interim obturator for a bilateral total maxillectomy defect.
Shaker KT
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 11203627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of obturator design for acquired maxillary defect in completely edentulous patients.
Ahila SC; Anitha KV; Thulasingam C
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):161-3. PubMed ID: 21525697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Shark Fin Titanium Hollow Bulb Obturator: A Treatment Concept.
Kapadia Y; Kurtz KS; Jain V; Pigliacelli S
J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):798-802. PubMed ID: 30281191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in edentulous maxillectomy patients: A cross-sectional study to compare implant-supported obturators and conventional obturators.
Buurman DJM; Speksnijder CM; Engelen BHBT; Kessler P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 May; 31(5):405-416. PubMed ID: 31944417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Three kinds of speech evaluation in maxillectomy patients during the fabrication process of a hollow-type obturator].
Hattori M; Sumita Y; Taniguchi H
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jun; 80(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 23986953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. New technologies, designs and materials for removable maxillary obturator prostheses.
Da Silva L; Ferros I; Rilo B
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2004; 46(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 15646392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Form, Function, and Esthetics in Prosthetically Rehabilitated Maxillary Defects.
Mittal M; Sharma R; Kalra A; Sharma P
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e8-e12. PubMed ID: 29023293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Simple method for fabricating a cast partial framework obturator for lifelike appearance: a case report.
Kharade P; Sharma S
Gen Dent; 2013; 61(6):42-5. PubMed ID: 24064162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy.
Weischer T; Schettler D; Mohr C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 9109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Speech intelligibility in various types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].
Hasanreisoğlu U; Gürbüz A; Belgin E
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 2637037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Life after total laryngectomy: a measure of long-term survival, function, and quality of life.
Woodard TD; Oplatek A; Petruzzelli GJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 133(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 17576901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Evaluation of the speech of maxillectomy patients following obturator prosthetic treatment].
Takahashi Y
Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1986 Jun; 31(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 3528442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Investigation of factor affecting health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients.
Morimata J; Otomaru T; Murase M; Haraguchi M; Sumita Y; Taniguchi H
Gerodontology; 2013 Sep; 30(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 22607478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of speech and aesthetic outcomes in patients with maxillary reconstruction versus maxillary obturators after maxillectomy.
Rieger JM; Tang JA; Wolfaardt J; Harris J; Seikaly H
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 21303600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Use of Orbital Conformer to Improve Speech in Patients with Confluent Maxillectomy and Orbital Defects.
Colebeck AC; Kase MT; Nichols CB; Golden M; Huryn JM
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 25953143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The nasopalatine canal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Uribe R; García B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):936-42. PubMed ID: 19865635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
