These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20980961)

  • 1. Hearing preservation in partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski PH
    Med Sci Monit; 2010 Nov; 16(11):CR555-62. PubMed ID: 20980961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term results of partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S21-3. PubMed ID: 24869434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Adunka MC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
    Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
    von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method of partial deafness treatment.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Apr; 9(4):CS20-4. PubMed ID: 12709676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.
    Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
    Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bimodal hearing in Korean children with profound hearing loss.
    Lee SH; Lee KY; Huh MJ; Jang HS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 128(11):1227-32. PubMed ID: 19241597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incomplete cochlear partition type II variants as an indicator of congenital partial deafness: a first report.
    Ha JF; Wood B; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan GP
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 22805102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case series of paediatric hearing preservation cochlear implantation: a new treatment modality for children with drug-induced or congenital partial deafness.
    Kuthubutheen J; Hedne CN; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan GP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):321-30. PubMed ID: 22739546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative neural response telemetry as a predictor of performance.
    Cosetti MK; Shapiro WH; Green JE; Roman BR; Lalwani AK; Gunn SH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20679959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.
    Nguyen Y; Mosnier I; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Ferrary E; Sterkers O
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 133(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23216055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.