These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet? Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Adunka MC; Buchman CA Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1049-54. PubMed ID: 20351607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience. Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method of partial deafness treatment. Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A Med Sci Monit; 2003 Apr; 9(4):CS20-4. PubMed ID: 12709676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review. Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss? Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of bimodal hearing in Korean children with profound hearing loss. Lee SH; Lee KY; Huh MJ; Jang HS Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 128(11):1227-32. PubMed ID: 19241597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs. Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incomplete cochlear partition type II variants as an indicator of congenital partial deafness: a first report. Ha JF; Wood B; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan GP Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 22805102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A case series of paediatric hearing preservation cochlear implantation: a new treatment modality for children with drug-induced or congenital partial deafness. Kuthubutheen J; Hedne CN; Krishnaswamy J; Rajan GP Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):321-30. PubMed ID: 22739546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative neural response telemetry as a predictor of performance. Cosetti MK; Shapiro WH; Green JE; Roman BR; Lalwani AK; Gunn SH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20679959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]