These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20981435)
21. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer. Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))]. Loudot C; Zanin E; Fogliarini C; Boulze M; Souchon L; Denis D J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Jun; 34(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 21550131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intrasession Repeatability of Biometric Measurements Obtained with a Low-Coherence Interferometry System in Pseudophakic Eyes. Fukumitsu H; Camps VJ; Piñero DP Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 31438734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes. Shen P; Zheng Y; Ding X; Liu B; Congdon N; Morgan I; He M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 23228592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OCULAR BIOMETRIC FACTORS IN GLAUCOMATOUS PATIENTS WITH PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE SYNDROME AS MEASURED BY OPTICAL LOW-COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY. Janjetović Ž; Bušić M; Bosnar D; Barać J; Genda I Acta Clin Croat; 2019 Mar; 58(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 31363329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes. Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry : intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Vogel A; Dick HB; Krummenauer F J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Dec; 27(12):1961-8. PubMed ID: 11738911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens. Garza-Leon M; Fuentes-de la Fuente HA; García-Treviño AV Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 27770390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Repeatability, reproducibility, and comparison of ocular biometry using a new optical coherence tomography-based system and another device. Wylęgała A; Bolek B; Mazur R; Wylęgała E Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14440. PubMed ID: 32879353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation]. El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar. McAlinden C; Gao R; Yu A; Wang X; Yang J; Yu Y; Chen H; Wang Q; Huang J Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 101(9):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 28130351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]