676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20981528)
21. Automated pharmacophore query optimization with genetic algorithms - a case study using the MC4R system.
Jia L; Zou J; So SS; Sun H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1545-52. PubMed ID: 17555310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bioactivity-guided navigation of chemical space.
Bon RS; Waldmann H
Acc Chem Res; 2010 Aug; 43(8):1103-14. PubMed ID: 20481515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
Mayr LM; Bojanic D
Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Probing the bioactivity-relevant chemical space of robust reactions and common molecular building blocks.
Hartenfeller M; Eberle M; Meier P; Nieto-Oberhuber C; Altmann KH; Schneider G; Jacoby E; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1167-78. PubMed ID: 22512717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated recycling of chemistry for virtual screening and library design.
Vainio MJ; Kogej T; Raubacher F
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jul; 52(7):1777-86. PubMed ID: 22657574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Focused library design in GPCR projects on the example of 5-HT(2c) agonists: comparison of structure-based virtual screening with ligand-based search methods.
Bissantz C; Schalon C; Guba W; Stahl M
Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):938-52. PubMed ID: 16224780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 3D QSAR pharmacophore based virtual screening and molecular docking for identification of potential HSP90 inhibitors.
Sakkiah S; Thangapandian S; John S; Kwon YJ; Lee KW
Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Jun; 45(6):2132-40. PubMed ID: 20206418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: Influence of canonical atom labeling on similarity searching.
Hähnke V; Rupp M; Krier M; Rippmann F; Schneider G
J Comput Chem; 2010 Nov; 31(15):2810-26. PubMed ID: 20839306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bioisosteric similarity of molecules based on structural alignment and observed chemical replacements in drugs.
Krier M; Hutter MC
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 May; 49(5):1280-97. PubMed ID: 19402687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Very large virtual compound spaces: construction, storage and utility in drug discovery.
Peng Z
Drug Discov Today Technol; 2013 Sep; 10(3):e387-94. PubMed ID: 24050135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In silico design of small molecules.
Bernardo PH; Tong JC
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 800():25-31. PubMed ID: 21964780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mining for bioactive scaffolds with scaffold networks: improved compound set enrichment from primary screening data.
Varin T; Schuffenhauer A; Ertl P; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jul; 51(7):1528-38. PubMed ID: 21615076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Small-world phenomena in chemical library networks: application to fragment-based drug discovery.
Tanaka N; Ohno K; Niimi T; Moritomo A; Mori K; Orita M
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2677-86. PubMed ID: 19961207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design.
Ebalunode JO; Zheng W; Tropsha A
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():111-33. PubMed ID: 20981521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PhAST: pharmacophore alignment search tool.
Hähnke V; Hofmann B; Grgat T; Proschak E; Steinhilber D; Schneider G
J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):761-71. PubMed ID: 18727161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. ChemDB update--full-text search and virtual chemical space.
Chen JH; Linstead E; Swamidass SJ; Wang D; Baldi P
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2348-51. PubMed ID: 17599932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioturbo similarity searching: combining chemical and biological similarity to discover structurally diverse bioactive molecules.
Wassermann AM; Lounkine E; Glick M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):692-703. PubMed ID: 23461561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new method for in-silico drug screening and similarity search using molecular dynamics maximum volume overlap (MD-MVO) method.
Fukunishi Y; Nakamura H
J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 19046907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
