674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20981528)
61. PZIM: a method for similarity searching using atom environments and 2D alignment.
Berglund AE; Head RD
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Oct; 50(10):1790-5. PubMed ID: 20886834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Chemical Structure Similarity Search for Ligand-based Virtual Screening: Methods and Computational Resources.
Yan X; Liao C; Liu Z; Hagler AT; Gu Q; Xu J
Curr Drug Targets; 2016; 17(14):1580-1585. PubMed ID: 26521773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Fuzzy tricentric pharmacophore fingerprints. 1. Topological fuzzy pharmacophore triplets and adapted molecular similarity scoring schemes.
Bonachéra F; Parent B; Barbosa F; Froloff N; Horvath D
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2457-77. PubMed ID: 17125187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Improving similarity-driven library design: customized matching and regioselective feature trees.
Fischer JR; Lessel U; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2156-63. PubMed ID: 21848342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A screening study of ChirBase molecular database to explore the expanded chiral pool derived from the application of chiral chromatography.
Piras P; Roussel C
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Apr; 46(5):839-47. PubMed ID: 17942261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Designing a diverse high-quality library for crystallography-based FBDD screening.
Tounge BA; Parker MH
Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():3-20. PubMed ID: 21371585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Ligand-based virtual screening by novelty detection with self-organizing maps.
Hristozov D; Oprea TI; Gasteiger J
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2044-62. PubMed ID: 17854167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Conformational sampling for large-scale virtual screening: accuracy versus ensemble size.
Griewel A; Kayser O; Schlosser J; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19788252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. G-protein coupled receptors virtual screening using genetic algorithm focused chemical space.
Sage C; Wang R; Jones G
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1754-61. PubMed ID: 21761904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases.
Medina-Franco JL; Maggiora GM; Giulianotti MA; Pinilla C; Houghten RA
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17927720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Combining biophysical screening and X-ray crystallography for fragment-based drug discovery.
Hennig M; Ruf A; Huber W
Top Curr Chem; 2012; 317():115-43. PubMed ID: 21837555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Searching for substructures in fragment spaces.
Ehrlich HC; Volkamer A; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3181-9. PubMed ID: 23205736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. CLEVER: pipeline for designing in silico chemical libraries.
Song CM; Bernardo PH; Chai CL; Tong JC
J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 18986817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: advancing beyond conventional small-molecule libraries.
Franzini RM; Neri D; Scheuermann J
Acc Chem Res; 2014 Apr; 47(4):1247-55. PubMed ID: 24673190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Assessing synthetic accessibility of chemical compounds using machine learning methods.
Podolyan Y; Walters MA; Karypis G
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):979-91. PubMed ID: 20536191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Do not hesitate to use Tversky-and other hints for successful active analogue searches with feature count descriptors.
Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1543-62. PubMed ID: 23731338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Noncontiguous atom matching structural similarity function.
Teixeira AL; Falcao AO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2511-24. PubMed ID: 24044748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. CHIPMUNK: A Virtual Synthesizable Small-Molecule Library for Medicinal Chemistry, Exploitable for Protein-Protein Interaction Modulators.
Humbeck L; Weigang S; Schäfer T; Mutzel P; Koch O
ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):532-539. PubMed ID: 29392860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
