These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2098208)
1. New type metal bracket for suppression of resin remaining in debonding. Kinami H; Sugimura M; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H Dent Mater J; 1990 Jun; 9(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 2098208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new type ceramic bracket for suppression of resin remaining in debonding. Kinami H; Sugimura M; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():106-14. PubMed ID: 2130164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Suppression of remaining resin on the tooth surfaces in debonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2. Correlation between bracket base form design and remaining resin on the tooth surfaces]. Kinami H Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1987 Jun; 32(1):294-302. PubMed ID: 3332899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets. Blalock KA; Powers JM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tensile and shear strength of orthodontic bracket bonding with glass ionomer cement and acrylic resin. An in vitro comparison. Norevall LI; Sjögren G; Persson M Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 2096476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suppression of remaining resin on the tooth surfaces in debonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2. Correlation between bracket base form design and remaining resin on the tooth surfaces. Kinami H; Sugimura M; Takada K; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1988 Dec; 28():189-98. PubMed ID: 3077640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel. Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of flexural strength of orthodontic resin cement on bond strength of metal brackets to enamel surfaces. Li J Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 20937669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a phosphonate BIS-GMA resin as a bracket adhesive. Rux W; Cooley RL; Hicks JL Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 1838418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. Buzzitta VA; Hallgren SE; Powers JM Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6758593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets. Lippitz SJ; Staley RN; Jakobsen JR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thermal debracketing of orthodontic resins. Rueggeberg FA; Lockwood P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 2194390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glass ionomer cements used as bonding materials for metal orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study. Oen JO; Gjerdet NR; Wisth PJ Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 1834474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket systems in vitro. de Pulido LG; Powers JM Am J Orthod; 1983 Feb; 83(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 6337499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems. Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bond strengths of lingual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillumination. King L; Smith RT; Wendt SL; Behrents RG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Apr; 91(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 2952005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]