These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2098464)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments.
    Fouad AF; Krell KV; McKendry DJ; Koorbusch GF; Olson RA
    J Endod; 1990 Sep; 16(9):446-9. PubMed ID: 2098464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Accuracy of 2 electronic canal length measuring instruments].
    Ducoin F
    Rev Fr Endod; 1991 Mar; 10(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2020777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of an electric device (Neosono D-SE) for the measurement of tooth length.
    Bal CS; Chaudhary M
    Indian J Dent Res; 1989; 1(2-3):58-65. PubMed ID: 2490122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variables affecting electronic root canal measurement.
    Wu YN; Shi JN; Huang LZ; Xu YY
    Int Endod J; 1992 Mar; 25(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1399057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental evaluation of an electronic apical locating instrument: study of 100 clinical cases].
    Ferrand N; Claisse A
    Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Dec; 9(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 2077579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of the Endocater--an electronic apex locator.
    Keller ME; Brown CE; Newton CW
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):271-4. PubMed ID: 1940752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of working length determination methods: an in vivo / ex vivo study.
    Shanmugaraj M; Nivedha R; Mathan R; Balagopal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2007; 18(2):60-2. PubMed ID: 17502709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the major and minor foramen diameters on apical electronic probe measurements.
    Stein TJ; Corcoran JF; Zillich RM
    J Endod; 1990 Nov; 16(11):520-2. PubMed ID: 2084207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
    Pratten DH; McDonald NJ
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study of properties of electrical root canal length measuring instruments].
    Ott KH; Pioch T; Hoppe W
    ZWR; 1991 May; 100(5):313-4, 316, 318-9. PubMed ID: 1882577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Locating the apical foramen using electronic instruments: the Neosono D].
    Caramatti R; Ferrario P; Ginelli G; Pignanelli M
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Feb; 54(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 3460842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic determination of root canal length by newly developed measuring device. Influences of the diameter of apical foramen, the size of K-file and the root canal irrigants.
    Saito T; Yamashita Y
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 2099293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3 Electronic Apex Locators in Curved Canals of Mandibular Molars.
    Piasecki L; José Dos Reis P; Jussiani EI; Andrello AC
    J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1872-1877. PubMed ID: 30390968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vivo evaluation of Endex electronic apex locator.
    Frank AL; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 1993 Apr; 19(4):177-9. PubMed ID: 8326263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of five root canal length measuring instruments.
    Fouad AF; Krell KV
    J Endod; 1989 Dec; 15(12):573-7. PubMed ID: 2639957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrical impedance measurements of root canal length.
    Meredith N; Gulabivala K
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Jun; 13(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 9550026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of recapitulation on accuracy of electronically determined canal length.
    Rivera EM; Seraji MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 8361736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.