These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of calculus detection among dental hygienists using an explorer and ultrasonic insert. Partido BB; Webb CA; Carr MP Int J Dent Hyg; 2019 May; 17(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 30714331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The qualitative effects of various types of hygiene instrumentation on commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implant abutments: an in vitro and scanning electron microscope study. Brookshire FV; Nagy WW; Dhuru VB; Ziebert GJ; Chada S J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 9297646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of various hygiene procedures on the surface characteristics of titanium abutments. Meschenmoser A; d'Hoedt B; Meyle J; Elssner G; Korn D; Hämmerle H; Schulte W J Periodontol; 1996 Mar; 67(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 8708954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures. Matarasso S; Quaremba G; Coraggio F; Vaia E; Cafiero C; Lang NP Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9002824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of an airbrasive instrument on soft and hard tissues around osseointegrated implants. A case report. Bergendal T; Forsgren L; Kvint S; Löwstedt E Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2264015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Speelman JA; Collaert B; Klinge B Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 1290792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Possibilies of improving the effciency in the use of ultrasonic devices for the removal of dental plaque and concrement]. Henke VE; Obermeyer P Stomatol DDR; 1976 Oct; 26(10):641-3. PubMed ID: 1070817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of various ultrasonic devices for the removal of dental calculus]. Spranger H ZWR; 1976 Feb; 85(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 1062090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]