These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2098562)

  • 1. Suspension mechanism of subperiosteal implants in baboons.
    Whittaker JM; James RA; Lozada J; Cordova C; Freidline C
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 2098562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load characteristics and design principles of mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Wagner JR
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1289539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale.
    Kim Y; Oh TJ; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 15642028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
    Fettig RH; Kay JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant.
    Schou S; Pallesen L; Hjørting-Hansen E; Pedersen CS; Fibaek B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11168208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out?
    Stanford CM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2005 Apr; 33(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 15915884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histomorphometric comparison of implant anchorage for two types of dental implants after 3 and 6 months' healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Larsen PE; Gerard DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 11264935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-protected occlusion.
    Misch CE; Bides MW
    Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9117850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants.
    Misch CE
    Dent Today; 2002 Sep; 21(9):76-81. PubMed ID: 12271847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale.
    Misch CE; Bidez MW
    Compendium; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1330, 1332, 1334 passim; quiz 1344. PubMed ID: 7758022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate loading of modified acid etched dental implants in postextraction sockets: a histological and histomorphometrical comparative study in nonhuman primate Papio ursinus.
    Mangano C; Piattelli A; Mangano F; Perrotti V; Iezzi G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 19359865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forces and moments on Branemark implants.
    Rangert B; Jemt T; Jörneus L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 2700747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.
    Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.
    Vernino AR; Kohles SS; Holt RA; Lee HM; Caudill RF; Kenealy JN
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12212687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occlusal stability in implant prosthodontics -- clinical factors to consider before implant placement.
    Saba S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 67(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 11597344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history.
    Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A newly designed partial subperiosteal implant and the classical design: a comparative study.
    Ferrer F
    P R Health Sci J; 1994 Sep; 13(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7997500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 9581410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.