These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2098728)

  • 1. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique.
    Schwartz JL; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 2098728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer-based resin restorations.
    Wieczkowski G; Joynt RB; Davis EL; Yu XY; Cleary K
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1437682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage in the sandwich technique.
    Mount GJ; Papageorgiou A; Makinson OF
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 1290608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA; Chapman KW
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occlusodistal composite resin restorations.
    Eakle WS; Ito RK
    Quintessence Int; 1990 May; 21(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 2243940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations.
    Besnault C; Attal JP
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12967073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior resins: microleakage below the cementoenamel junction.
    Kanca J
    Quintessence Int; 1987 May; 18(5):347-9. PubMed ID: 3473512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations.
    Moazzami SM; Sarabi N; Hajizadeh H; Majidinia S; Li Y; Meharry MR; Shahrokh H
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 24151926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct class V and class II sandwich restorations.
    Sjödin L; Uusitalo M; van Dijken J
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(3):77-86. PubMed ID: 8957133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodontic access preparations.
    Kleitches AJ; Lemon RR; Jeansonne BG
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9520778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
    Castro A; Feigal RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.