878 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2099294)
1. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
Ishida K
Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
Ishida K
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy.
Davis RD; Schwartz RS
Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of second pour casts using dual-arch impressions.
Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 1290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using double-poured alginate impressions to fabricate bleaching trays.
Haywood VB; Powe A
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 9656923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
Biffar R; Bittner B
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
