These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2099390)
21. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study. Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interview on facial esthetics with Dr. Anthony A. Gianelly. Sarver DM Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 16552457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The vertical dimension: the high-angle problem. Klontz HA World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):336-44. PubMed ID: 17190226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Cephalometric evaluation of vertical dimension in individual Venezuelans]. Rojas de Nieves M Acta Odontol Venez; 1982; 20(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 6964765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography]. Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Vertical typology and natural posture of the head]. Bacon W; Hildwein M; Turlot JC Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():533-42. PubMed ID: 2490236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment. Shell TL; Woods MG Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types. Vianna-Lara MS; Caria PH; Tosello Dde O; Lara F; Amorim MM Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiological evaluation of facial types in mouth breathing children: a retrospective study. Izuka EN; Costa JR; Pereira SR; Weckx LL; Pignatari SN; Uema SF Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2008; 19(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 19263631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion. Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [A diagnostic method for vertical dimension: the Biggerstaff analysis]. Herrera P Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1984 Apr; 18(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 6597945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part II: Facial axis changes and stability. Beatrice M; Woods M Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12476496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Correction of the vertical dimension based on extraoral measurements]. Hennicke A ZWR; 1976 Mar; 85(5):211-7. PubMed ID: 1062878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cumulative frequency distribution in East Asian facial widths using the facial golden mask. Lee JH; Kim TG; Park GW; Kim YH J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1378-82. PubMed ID: 19816261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]