82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2099547)
1. [Marginal leakage in composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Effect of material, cavity preparation and enamel conditioning at the cervical level].
Marotta Araujo R; da Silva Filho FP; Dias Mendes AJ
Rev Odontol UNESP; 1990; 19(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 2099547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal leakage around V-shaped cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
Zyskind D; Frenkel A; Fuks A; Hirschfeld Z
Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 1838417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [In vitro study of the microleakage pattern around posterior composite resin restorations using a new dentin bonding agent].
Tzoutzas J; Donovan T; Babou M
Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Dec; 43(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 2518077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations in combination with dentinal and enamel bonding agents.
Sparrius O; Grossman ES
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):678-84. PubMed ID: 2657024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonding efficacy of 1-step self-etch adhesives: effect of additional enamel etching and hydrophobic layer application.
Manuja N; Nagpal R; Chaudhary S
J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22449502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
Salim S; Santini A; Husham A
Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
