These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability. Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates. Grassi M Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 15971691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PROPERTIES OF SOUND AND THE AUDITORY-VISUAL DIFFERENCE IN TIME JUDGMENT. GOLDFARB JL; GOLDSTONE S Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Oct; 19():606. PubMed ID: 14214737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers. Narendran MM; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancement, adaptation, and the binaural system. Serman M; Semal C; Demany L J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4412-20. PubMed ID: 18537392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation. Pisanski K; Isenstein SGE; Montano KJ; O'Connor JJM; Feinberg DR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 28229428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generalization of a reference scale for judging pitch. JOHNSON DM J Exp Psychol; 1949 Jun; 39(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 18145228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A duplex theory of pitch perception. LICKLIDER JC Experientia; 1951 Apr; 7(4):128-34. PubMed ID: 14831572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified methods of constant and single stimuli in pitch discrimination. KOESTER T; SCHOENFELD WH Am J Psychol; 1945 Oct; 58():540-4. PubMed ID: 21004460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral information for detection of acoustic time to arrival. Gordon MS; Russo FA; MacDonald E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):738-50. PubMed ID: 23359354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Category judgments of loudnesses in the absence of an experimenter-induced identification function: sequential effects and power-function fit. Ward LM J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jul; 94(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 5044270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-stimulus judgments of loudness as a function of presentation-interval. BEVAN W; PRITCHARD JF; REED WG Am J Psychol; 1962 Dec; 75():612-8. PubMed ID: 13967903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods. Moore BC; Sęk A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of a change heuristic in judgments of sound intensity. Leboe LC; Mondor TA Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 20178937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues. Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. Cousineau M; Demany L; Pressnitzer D J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3179-87. PubMed ID: 20000931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of musical background on judgments of dysphonia. Eadie TL; Van Boven L; Stubbs K; Giannini E J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19038531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]