These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21002091)

  • 1. Free voice and pure tone audiometer for routine testing of auditory acuity; studies on comparative efficiency.
    HARRIS JD
    Arch Otolaryngol (1925); 1946 Oct; 44(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 21002091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing screening with portable screening pure-tone audiometer and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wang YF; Wang SS; Tai CC; Lin LC; Shiao AS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Jun; 65(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 12201570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical role of free-field voice tests in children.
    Dempster JH; Mackenzie K
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Feb; 17(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 1555319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing screening for school children: comparison of low-cost, computer-based and conventional audiometry.
    McPherson B; Law MM; Wong MS
    Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 20507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Comparison of two methods.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 1842286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Author's response to the letter about the article: Hearing screenings for pre-school children: A comparison between whispered voice and pure tone audiogram tests.
    Skoloudik L; Mejzlik J; Chrobok V
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110199. PubMed ID: 32660711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MINIMUM requirements for acceptable pure tone audiometers for diagnostic purposes.
    J Am Med Assoc; 1951 May; 146(3):255-7. PubMed ID: 14823924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MINIMAL requirements for acceptable pure tone audiometers for screening purposes.
    J Am Med Assoc; 1950 Oct; 144(6):465. PubMed ID: 14774122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure tone audiometry and whispered voice test. Conformities and differences in tests results.
    Groen JJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1973; 35(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 4795630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Age and sex variations.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M; Bloigu R
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1842287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electronic organization for hearing, voice and speech studies at the Graz University HNO Clinic].
    Horwath T
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):169-72. PubMed ID: 16114387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Development of High-performance Hearing Test System].
    Cao L; Li Y; Huang H; Deng Z; Wu B; Liu P; Peng Z
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 46(2):152-155. PubMed ID: 35411740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations.
    Barlow C; Davison L; Ashmore M; Weinstein R
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Standardization of pure tone audiometers with special reference to the acoustic characteristics of different types of earphones].
    DIEROFF HG
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1959; 174(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 13637925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An automatic, self-recording pure tone mass audiometer for industrial purposes.
    KOBRAK HG
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1957 Nov; 19(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 13494304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Subjective intraoperative hearing self-assessment in patients after stapedotomy comparing to postoperative pure-tone audiometry].
    Jankowski A; Durko T; Pajor A; Durko M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 21166139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD REFERENCE ZERO FOR PURE-TONE AUDIOMETERS AND ITS RELATION TO THE EVALUATION ON IMPAIRMENT OF HEARING.
    DAVIS H; KRANZ FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1964 Mar; 7():7-16. PubMed ID: 14130747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two methods of preschool and kindergarten hearing screening.
    Hamill B
    J Sch Health; 1988 Mar; 58(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 3352234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Value of preliminary hearing tests].
    Reiss M; Reiss G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2003; 153(3-4):73-5. PubMed ID: 12658966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.