These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2101378)

  • 1. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2101378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative to fetal monitoring].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2292430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile].
    Urbánková E; Toldy M
    Cesk Gynekol; 1989 Dec; 54(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 2698277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Kodack LD; Trofatter KF; Killam AP; Gall SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):365-9. PubMed ID: 3279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile.
    Inglis SR; Druzin ML; Wagner WE; Kogut E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 8355936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labor.
    Vintzileos AM; Gaffney SE; Salinger LM; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 70(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 3601282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive value of amniotic fluid index for oligohydramnios in patients with prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 8796797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of fetal well-being using a modified Doppler flowmetric profile].
    Romero Gutiérrez G; Vargas Origel A; Zamora Orozco J; Alvarado López MR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 Sep; 68():371-80. PubMed ID: 11080943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biophysical profile and the nonstress test: poor predictors of chorioamnionitis and fetal infection in prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Del Valle GO; Joffe GM; Izquierdo LA; Smith JF; Gilson GJ; Curet LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 1603478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial.
    Manning FA; Lange IR; Morrison I; Harman CR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 6379529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sinusoidal heart rate pattern and an normal biophysical profile in a severely compromised fetus.
    Yaffe H; Kreisberg GA; Gale R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1989; 68(6):561-3. PubMed ID: 2520816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antepartum determination of fetal health: composite biophysical profile scoring.
    Manning FA; Morrison I; Lange IR; Harman C
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 7116752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal assessment based on the fetal biophysical profile score: relationship of last BPS result to subsequent cerebral palsy.
    Manning FA; Bondagji N; Harman CR; Casiro O; Menticoglou S; Morrison I
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(7):720-9. PubMed ID: 9436057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biophysical profile in twin pregnancy: prospective study].
    Medina D; Vargas N; Bustos JC; Cadima R; Lavarello C
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 7569148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.