These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2101659)

  • 1. [Investigation of the effect of functional treatment in skeletal Class III cases on the profile facial esthetics].
    Altuğ Z; Erdem D; Rübendüz M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 2101659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of the functional treatment effects of the skeletal and dental Class III anomalies on the skeletal region].
    Altuğ Z; Erdem D; Rübendüz M
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 2489495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentofacial changes in patients with Class III malocclusions treated by a combination of activator and chin-cup appliances.
    Basdra EK; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 9528405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.
    Saadia M; Torres E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):669-80. PubMed ID: 10842110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points.
    Arun T; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):392-8. PubMed ID: 9582620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preliminary investigation of lower second molar extraction in correction of severe skeletal class III malocclusion].
    Lin JX; Gu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 41(9):537-41. PubMed ID: 17129425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A; Ufuk Toygar T; Abuhijleh E
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of facial profile changes in individuals with skeletal Class II anomaly treated with activator and activator + occipital headgear].
    Gögen H; Parlar S
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 2489162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The chin-cap and its synergistic use with functional therapy in a case of Angle class III].
    Cassarino G; Rizzo R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1983; 32(5):705-9. PubMed ID: 6585617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early treatment of skeletal Class III: a case report.
    Maheshwari S; Gupta ND
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):148-51. PubMed ID: 12396092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
    Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Preliminary study of non-surgical treatment of severe Class III malocclusion in 18 patients of 12-20 years old].
    Lin JX; Gu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15061874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Long-term results of skeletal profile changes occurring during chincap therapy in male Japanese skeletal Class III cases].
    Tsuchikawa T; Sugawara J; Nakamura H; Mitani H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 44(4):644-59. PubMed ID: 3869183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of changes associated with chin cup treatment.
    Deguchi T; Kitsugi A
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 8712492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.