These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2101665)

  • 1. [A cephalometric comparison of maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth position and soft tissue profile].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2101665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentoskeletal determinants of soft tissue morphology.
    Saxby PJ; Freer TJ
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 3860026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The effect of growth and development on soft tissue profile in boys and girls with normal occlusion].
    Uner O; Dinçer M; Eroğlu EY
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2101660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incisor retraction and profile changes in adult patients.
    Valentim ZL; Capelli Júnior J; Almeida MA; Bailey LJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8006481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue facial profile of normal dental and skeletal subjects in Croatian population aged 12 to 15 years.
    Lapter Varga M; Anić Milosević S; Vusić A; Slaj M; Varga S; Perinić M; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):523-8. PubMed ID: 18756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion.
    Lundström A; Forsberg CM; Peck S; McWilliam J
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 1626746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements.
    Ozdemir ST; Sigirli D; Ercan I; Cankur NS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 19089493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions.
    Hasanreisoglu U; Berksun S; Aras K; Arslan I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 16316799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study on the intrinsic compensative mechanism of craniofacial soft and hard tissue structures of Uygur adults with normal occlusion].
    Jin H; Luo S; Bai D; Song J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Aug; 18(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 12539541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mandibular values in adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 2101662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.