These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2102322)
21. Fetal behaviour and biophysics as observed by ultrasound. Nijhuis JG J Perinat Med; 1991; 19 Suppl 1():145-50. PubMed ID: 1779350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Does Doppler blood flow measurement and the fetal actogram proven advantages over the classical fetal monitoring in pregnancy with the aid of cardiotocography? ]. Heinrich J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 2970738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings. Signorini MG; Magenes G; Cerutti S; Arduini D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 12669993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Cardiotocography practice. Case 15]. Heinrich J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 3129884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. State of the art. Druzin ML Clin Perinatol; 1989 Sep; 16(3):627-42. PubMed ID: 2673612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography]. Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Need for extensive education when implementing new foetal monitoring technology]. Colov NS Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Sep; 169(39):3294-7. PubMed ID: 17953889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Cardiotocography practice. Case 11]. Heinrich J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(17):1076-8. PubMed ID: 3491474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The monitoring of high-risk pregnancy by non-stressed antepartum cardiotocography. Kulkarni S; Matadial L West Indian Med J; 1985 Sep; 34(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 4072183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The biophysical profile: antepartal assessment of fetal well-being. Gebauer CL; Lowe NK J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1993; 22(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 8478735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful? Krantz CA; Shaffer LE Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):400; author reply 400. PubMed ID: 14754716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Strip of the Month: Decreased Fetal Movement and Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. MacGregor C; Grable I Neoreviews; 2020 Jan; 21(1):e55-e62. PubMed ID: 31894085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Guidelines for the use of cardiotocography]. Heinrich J Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 3285626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Monitoring of fetal biophysical profile]. Zhang DT Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1988 Jul; 23(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 3064986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical practice variation in reduced fetal movements]. Frøen JF; Saastad E; Tveit JV; Børdahl PE; Stray-Pedersen B Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Oct; 125(19):2631-4. PubMed ID: 16215607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Methods of adequate evaluation of the fetal status in modern delivery room]. Marinova N; Marinska M; Nikolov A; Pavlova E Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45 Suppl 3():20-3. PubMed ID: 18240718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]