These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21028950)
1. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant. Hasan I; Heinemann F; Aitlahrach M; Bourauel C Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Dec; 55(6):341-50. PubMed ID: 21028950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: extensive study of commercial implants. Bourauel C; Aitlahrach M; Heinemann F; Hasan I Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Jan; 57(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 23092989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis. Toth A; Hasan I; Bourauel C; Mundt T; Biffar R; Heinemann F Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Aug; 62(4):393-405. PubMed ID: 28358711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical finite element analysis of self-tapping implants with different dimensions inserted in two bone qualities. Hasan I; Heinemann F; Bourauel C Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Jun; 59(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 24695023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress transfer properties of different commercial dental implants: a finite element study. Pérez MA; Prados-Frutos JC; Bea JA; Doblaré M Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 21170768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical response of bone under short-term loading of a dental implant with an internal layer simulating the nonlinear behaviour of the periodontal ligament. Genna F; Paganelli C; Salgarello S; Sapelli P Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):305-18. PubMed ID: 14675951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck--a FEM study. Rahimi A; Bourauel C; Jager A; Gedrange T; Heinemann F J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 60 Suppl 8():107-12. PubMed ID: 20400802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants. Stahl E; Keilig L; Abdelgader I; Jäger A; Bourauel C J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 19322530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of biomechanical interactions of a tooth-implant splinting system for various bone qualities. Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC Chang Gung Med J; 2006; 29(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 16767962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]