These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21030140)

  • 21. Effect of bubble shell nonlinearity on ultrasound nonlinear propagation through microbubble populations.
    Tang MX; Loughran J; Stride E; Zhang D; Eckersley RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 21428471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.
    Loughran J; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4349-57. PubMed ID: 22712909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal design and experimental investigation of surfactant encapsulated microbubbles.
    Zong Y; Wan M; Wang S; Zhang G
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e119-22. PubMed ID: 16859725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall.
    Overvelde M; Garbin V; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1500-8. PubMed ID: 21816289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.
    Chien CT; Burns PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15128215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law.
    Tsiglifis K; Pelekasis NA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4059-70. PubMed ID: 18537358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radial modulation of single microbubbles.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; Versluis M; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2370-9. PubMed ID: 19942524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents.
    Loughran J; Sennoga C; J Eckersley R; Tang MX
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6999-7014. PubMed ID: 23044731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index.
    Tang MX; Eckersley RJ; Noble JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 15749561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound.
    Marmottant P; Bouakaz A; de Jong N; Quilliet C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1231-9. PubMed ID: 21428486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combined optical and acoustical detection of single microbubble dynamics.
    Sijl J; Vos HJ; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3271-81. PubMed ID: 22087999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.
    Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound-induced dissolution of lipid-coated and uncoated gas bubbles.
    Cox DJ; Thomas JL
    Langmuir; 2010 Sep; 26(18):14774-81. PubMed ID: 20722377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles.
    Biagi E; Breschi L; Masotti L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 16118987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo characterization of ultrasound contrast agents: microbubble spectroscopy in a chicken embryo.
    Faez T; Skachkov I; Versluis M; Kooiman K; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 22766113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nonlinear emission from individual bound microbubbles at high frequencies.
    Sprague MR; Chérin E; Goertz DE; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 20018429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence.
    Postema M; Marmottant P; Lancée CT; Hilgenfeldt S; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15582233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.