These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21030317)
21. Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Yoshio K; Murakami N; Morota M; Harada K; Kitaguchi M; Yamagishi K; Sekii S; Takahashi K; Inaba K; Mayahara H; Ito Y; Sumi M; Kanazawa S; Itami J J Radiat Res; 2013 Nov; 54(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 23728322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization. Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment planning for MRI assisted brachytherapy of gynecologic malignancies based on total dose constraints. Lang S; Kirisits C; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Pötter R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):619-27. PubMed ID: 17869676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: radiobiological and dosimetric considerations. Guerrero M; Li XA; Ma L; Linder J; Deyoung C; Erickson B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):933-9. PubMed ID: 15936580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Oncentra® Brachy IPSA and graphical optimisation techniques: a case study of HDR brachytherapy head and neck and prostate plans. Jameson MG; Ohanessian L; Batumalai V; Patel V; Holloway LC J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 62(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 26229683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy. Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of different treatment planning optimization methods for vaginal HDR brachytherapy with multichannel applicators: A reduction of the high doses to the vaginal mucosa is possible. Carrara M; Cusumano D; Giandini T; Tenconi C; Mazzarella E; Grisotto S; Massari E; Mazzeo D; Cerrotta A; Pappalardi B; Fallai C; Pignoli E Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():58-65. PubMed ID: 29254592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy. Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy. Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiobiological treatment planning evaluation of inverse planning simulated annealing for cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Palmqvist T; Dos S Matias L; Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Wanderås AD; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I Anticancer Res; 2015 Feb; 35(2):935-9. PubMed ID: 25667477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma. Srivastava S; Singh N; Kashyap VK J Biomed Phys Eng; 2022 Aug; 12(4):339-348. PubMed ID: 36059288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients. Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer. Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study. Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions. Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]