BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21030744)

  • 21. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel fluence map optimization model incorporating leaf sequencing constraints.
    Jin R; Min Z; Song E; Liu H; Ye Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1243-64. PubMed ID: 20124655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A geometrically based method of step and shoot stereotactic radiosurgery with a miniature multileaf collimator.
    St John TJ; Wagner TH; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Meeks SL
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3263-76. PubMed ID: 16177508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. IMRT fluence map editing to control hot and cold spots.
    Cook JT; Tobler M; Leavitt DD; Watson G
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 16275561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
    Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer.
    Wolff D; Stieler F; Welzel G; Lorenz F; Abo-Madyan Y; Mai S; Herskind C; Polednik M; Steil V; Wenz F; Lohr F
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 19765846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitfalls in normalization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning.
    Williams G; Tobler M; Leavitt D
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 16275560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
    Jones S; Williams M
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Total-variation regularization based inverse planning for intensity modulated arc therapy.
    Zhu L; Niu T; Choi K; Xing L
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 11(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22335409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GPU-based ultrafast IMRT plan optimization.
    Men C; Gu X; Choi D; Majumdar A; Zheng Z; Mueller K; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6565-73. PubMed ID: 19826201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A finite size pencil beam algorithm for IMRT dose optimization: density corrections.
    Jeleń U; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):617-33. PubMed ID: 17228109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An approach for practical multiobjective IMRT treatment planning.
    Craft D; Halabi T; Shih HA; Bortfeld T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Dec; 69(5):1600-7. PubMed ID: 17920782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated with coplanar field and 3D conformal radiotherapy with noncoplanar field for postocular invasion tumor.
    Wenyong T; Lu L; Jun Z; Weidong Y; Yun L
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19931025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On-line re-optimization of prostate IMRT plans for adaptive radiation therapy.
    Wu QJ; Thongphiew D; Wang Z; Mathayomchan B; Chankong V; Yoo S; Lee WR; Yin FF
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):673-91. PubMed ID: 18199909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An exact approach to direct aperture optimization in IMRT treatment planning.
    Men C; Romeijn HE; Taşkin ZC; Dempsey JF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(24):7333-52. PubMed ID: 18065842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. IMRT treatment planning based on prioritizing prescription goals.
    Wilkens JJ; Alaly JR; Zakarian K; Thorstad WL; Deasy JO
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(6):1675-92. PubMed ID: 17327656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
    Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
    Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new Monte Carlo-based treatment plan optimization approach for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Li Y; Tian Z; Shi F; Song T; Wu Z; Liu Y; Jiang S; Jia X
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):2903-19. PubMed ID: 25776792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combined photon and electron three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy with integrated boost for adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma after pleuropneumonectomy.
    Krayenbuehl J; Oertel S; Davis JB; Ciernik IF
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Dec; 69(5):1593-9. PubMed ID: 17931793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.