These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21030748)

  • 1. AB-OSEM reconstruction for improved Patlak kinetic parameter estimation: a simulation study.
    Verhaeghe J; Reader AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6739-57. PubMed ID: 21030748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction algorithms for High-Resolution Research Tomograph studies: effects of randoms estimation methods.
    van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Wolfensberger SP; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3217-30. PubMed ID: 18506070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
    van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
    Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
    J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.
    Petibon Y; Rakvongthai Y; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3539-3565. PubMed ID: 28379843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM.
    Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
    Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
    Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
    Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic PET image reconstruction integrating temporal regularization associated with respiratory motion correction for applications in oncology.
    Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045012. PubMed ID: 29339575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of direct and indirect parametric estimation methods of linear models in dynamic positron emission tomography.
    Tsoumpas C; Turkheimer FE; Thielemans K
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1299-309. PubMed ID: 18491524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.
    Häggström I; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Larsson A
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111907. PubMed ID: 25370640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction.
    Jian Y; Planeta B; Carson RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 25479254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.
    Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
    van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
    Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo study of the dependence of early frame sampling on uncertainty and bias in pharmacokinetic parameters from dynamic PET.
    Häggström I; Axelsson J; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Garpebring A; Johansson L; Sörensen J; Larsson A
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25613339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER.
    Zhang X; Xie Z; Berg E; Judenhofer MS; Liu W; Xu T; Ding Y; Lv Y; Dong Y; Deng Z; Tang S; Shi H; Hu P; Chen S; Bao J; Li H; Zhou J; Wang G; Cherry SR; Badawi RD; Qi J
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 31302637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of
    Shi X; Li N; Ding H; Dang Y; Hu G; Liu S; Cui J; Zhang Y; Li F; Zhang H; Huo L
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():9193403. PubMed ID: 29681784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-oriented quantitative image reconstruction in emission tomography for single- and multi-subject studies.
    Verhaeghe J; Gravel P; Reader AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):7263-85. PubMed ID: 21081825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.