These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21030875)

  • 1. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.
    Lacy BE; Dukowicz AC; Robertson DJ; Weiss JE; Teixeira P; Kelley ML
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 21030875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical utility of esophageal manometry.
    Lacy BE; Paquette L; Robertson DJ; Kelley ML; Weiss JE
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 43(9):809-15. PubMed ID: 19295447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gastroesophageal reflux monitoring: pH (catheter and capsule) and impedance.
    Hong SK; Vaezi MF
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2009 Jan; 19(1):1-22, v. PubMed ID: 19232277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
    Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new medical device to assist the introduction of ambulatory 24-h pH-metry probe.
    Mangiavillano B; Mezzi G; Strini G; Testoni PA; Passaretti S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2006 Aug; 38(8):615-6. PubMed ID: 16621746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wireless capsules for esophageal pH monitoring: are we placing them correctly?
    Doma S; Paladugu S; Parkman HP; Friedenberg FK
    Digestion; 2010; 82(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 20215751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambulatory oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring for investigation of chest pain: a New Zealand experience.
    Cameron R; Barclay M; Dobbs B
    N Z Med J; 2006 Mar; 119(1230):U1877. PubMed ID: 16532043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esophageal pH monitoring goes wireless.
    Lawrence BL; Taylor D
    Nursing; 2007 Oct; 37(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 17906527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
    Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
    Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
    Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.
    Sweis R; Fox M; Anggiansah A; Wong T
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 May; 23(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 21235685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chest pain of undetermined origin.
    Just RJ; Castell DO
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1994 Oct; 4(4):731-46. PubMed ID: 7812644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic removal of the wireless pH monitoring capsule in patients with severe discomfort.
    Prakash C; Jonnalagadda S; Azar R; Clouse RE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Nov; 64(5):828-32. PubMed ID: 17055889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncardiac chest pain: an unsatisfactory 'diagnosis'?
    Hebbard G
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Dec; 25(12):1811-2. PubMed ID: 21091988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerability and clinical utility of the Bravo pH capsule in children.
    Lacy BE; Edwards S; Paquette L; Weiss J; Kelley ML; Ornvold K
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 43(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 19349903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
    Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
    Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.