BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21031526)

  • 21. An efficient level set method for simultaneous intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images.
    Ivanovska T; Laqua R; Wang L; Schenk A; Yoon JH; Hegenscheid K; Völzke H; Liebscher V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Mar; 48():9-20. PubMed ID: 26741125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intensity inhomogeneity correction for the breast sonogram: constrained fuzzy cell-based bipartitioning and polynomial surface modeling.
    Lee CY; Chou YH; Huang CS; Chang YC; Tiu CM; Chen CM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5645-54. PubMed ID: 21158276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel, fast entropy-minimization algorithm for bias field correction in MR images.
    Ji Q; Glass JO; Reddick WE
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Feb; 25(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 17275623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A level set method based on domain transformation and bias correction for MRI brain tumor segmentation.
    Khosravanian A; Rahmanimanesh M; Keshavarzi P; Mozaffari S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Mar; 352():109091. PubMed ID: 33515604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intensity correction with a pair of spoiled gradient recalled echo images.
    Noterdaeme O; Anderson M; Gleeson F; Brady SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3473-89. PubMed ID: 19436101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fast conjugate phase image reconstruction based on a Chebyshev approximation to correct for B0 field inhomogeneity and concomitant gradients.
    Chen W; Sica CT; Meyer CH
    Magn Reson Med; 2008 Nov; 60(5):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18956462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simulation of the influence of magnetic field inhomogeneity and distortion correction in MR imaging.
    Weis J; Budinský L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1990; 8(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2392035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization.
    Likar B; Viergever MA; Pernus F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1398-410. PubMed ID: 11811839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of intravoxel inhomogeneity correction for chemical exchange saturation transfer spectral imaging: a high-resolution field map-based deconvolution algorithm for magnetic field inhomogeneity correction.
    Sun PZ
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Apr; 83(4):1348-1355. PubMed ID: 31628765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image background inhomogeneity correction in MRI via intensity standardization.
    Zhuge Y; Udupa JK; Liu J; Saha PK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jan; 33(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 19004616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Level set segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on local Gaussian distribution fitting energy.
    Wang L; Chen Y; Pan X; Hong X; Xia D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 20230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intensity inhomogeneity correction for magnetic resonance imaging of human brain at 7T.
    Uwano I; Kudo K; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Ito K; Harada T; Ogawa A; Sasaki M
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022302. PubMed ID: 24506640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Library-driven approach for fast implementation of the voxel spread function to correct magnetic field inhomogeneity artifacts for gradient-echo sequences.
    Liu Y; Ye Q; Zeng F; Jiang X; Cai B; Lv W; Wen J
    Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3714-3720. PubMed ID: 33914914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method of RF inhomogeneity correction in MR imaging.
    Mihara H; Iriguchi N; Ueno S
    MAGMA; 1998 Dec; 7(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 9951771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic segmentation for brain MR images via a convex optimized segmentation and bias field correction coupled model.
    Chen Y; Zhao B; Zhang J; Zheng Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):941-55. PubMed ID: 24832358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Normalization of brain magnetic resonance images using histogram even-order derivative analysis.
    Christensen JD
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Sep; 21(7):817-20. PubMed ID: 14559347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An energy minimization method for MS lesion segmentation from T1-w and FLAIR images.
    Zhao Y; Guo S; Luo M; Liu Y; Bilello M; Li C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():1-6. PubMed ID: 27343952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Partial volume segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on maximum a posteriori probability.
    Li X; Li L; Lu H; Liang Z
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2337-45. PubMed ID: 16121590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.
    Manjón JV; Coupé P; Martí-Bonmatí L; Collins DL; Robles M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 20027588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Iterative off-resonance and signal decay estimation and correction for multi-echo MRI.
    Knopp T; Eggers H; Dahnke H; Prestin J; Sénégas J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Mar; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 19244011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.