BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21034464)

  • 21. Ranked Subtree Prune and Regraft.
    Collienne L; Whidden C; Gavryushkin A
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 Jan; 86(3):24. PubMed ID: 38294587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying hybridization in realistic time.
    Collins J; Linz S; Semple C
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1305-18. PubMed ID: 21210735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cherry picking: a characterization of the temporal hybridization number for a set of phylogenies.
    Humphries PJ; Linz S; Semple C
    Bull Math Biol; 2013 Oct; 75(10):1879-90. PubMed ID: 23925727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved parameterized complexity of the maximum agreement subtree and maximum compatible tree problems.
    Berry V; Nicolas F
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 17048466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inferring optimal species trees under gene duplication and loss.
    Bayzid MS; Mirarab S; Warnow T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():250-61. PubMed ID: 23424130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inferring and validating horizontal gene transfer events using bipartition dissimilarity.
    Boc A; Philippe H; Makarenkov V
    Syst Biol; 2010 Mar; 59(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 20525630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A More Practical Algorithm for the Rooted Triplet Distance.
    Jansson J; Rajaby R
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):106-126. PubMed ID: 27983874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimality of the neighbor joining algorithm and faces of the balanced minimum evolution polytope.
    Haws DC; Hodge TL; Yoshida R
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Nov; 73(11):2627-48. PubMed ID: 21373975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trying out a million genes to find the perfect pair with RTIST.
    Zhelezov G; Degnan JH
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 38(14):3565-3573. PubMed ID: 35641003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MASTtreedist: visualization of tree space based on maximum agreement subtree.
    Huang H; Li Y
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 23294272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing Phylogenetic Trees by Matching Nodes Using the Transfer Distance Between Partitions.
    Bogdanowicz D; Giaro K
    J Comput Biol; 2017 May; 24(5):422-435. PubMed ID: 28177699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hybridization in nonbinary trees.
    Linz S; Semple C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 19179697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exact Algorithms for Duplication-Transfer-Loss Reconciliation with Non-Binary Gene Trees.
    Kordi M; Bansal MS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(4):1077-1090. PubMed ID: 28622673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A practical O(n log2 n) time algorithm for computing the triplet distance on binary trees.
    Sand A; Brodal GS; Fagerberg R; Pedersen CN; Mailund T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18. PubMed ID: 23368759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neighborhoods of trees in circular orderings.
    Bastkowski S; Moulton V; Spillner A; Wu T
    Bull Math Biol; 2015 Jan; 77(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 25477080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A first step toward computing all hybridization networks for two rooted binary phylogenetic trees.
    Scornavacca C; Linz S; Albrecht B
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1227-42. PubMed ID: 23134319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rearrangement moves on rooted phylogenetic networks.
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Jones M; Lafond M; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005611. PubMed ID: 28763439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Problems with supertrees based on the subtree prune-and-regraft distance, with comments on majority rule supertrees.
    Goloboff PA; Szumik CA
    Cladistics; 2016 Feb; 32(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 34732022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic selection of representative proteins for bacterial phylogeny.
    Bern M; Goldberg D
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 May; 5():34. PubMed ID: 15927057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the complexity of rearrangement problems under the breakpoint distance.
    Kováč J
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 24200391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.