366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21035069)
1. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Andalib D; Gharabaghi D; Nabai R; Abbaszadeh M
J AAPOS; 2010 Oct; 14(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 21035069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Lee H; Ahn J; Lee JM; Park M; Baek S
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1010-4. PubMed ID: 22777434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults: monocanalicular or bicanalicular intubation.
Andalib D; Nabie R; Abbasi L
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1009-11. PubMed ID: 24670273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Komínek P; Cervenka S; Pniak T; Zeleník K; Tomášková H; Matoušek P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 249(11):1729-33. PubMed ID: 21681436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults.
Kashkouli MB; Kempster RC; Galloway GD; Beigi B
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 21(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 15778670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Kaufman LM; Guay-Bhatia LA
Ophthalmology; 1998 Feb; 105(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 9479296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Effectiveness of Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Under Nasal Endoscopic Visualization of the Terminal End of the Obstructed Nasolacrimal Duct.
Han JY; Lee H; Chang M; Park M; Lee JS; Baek S
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1328-31. PubMed ID: 26080187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparing of Treatment Results of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation in Inborn Lacrimal Duct Obstruction].
Červenka S; Matoušek P; Komínek P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(5):178-181. PubMed ID: 28224803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children: A Retrospective Review.
Eustis HS; Nguyen AH
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Jan; 55(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 28991351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Analysis of Silicone Tube Intubation Versus Probing and Balloon Dilation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alruwaili R; Alanazi F; Alrashidi A; Hazazi M; Alenezi M
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1114-1119. PubMed ID: 38727216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Premature Tube Extrusion for Simple Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Comparison of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation.
Dryden SC; Meador AG; Awh C; Smith BD; Eder AE; Bohn SN; Hoehn ME; Fowler B; Fleming JC
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 33(1):211-213. PubMed ID: 34292239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome.
Dotan G; Ohana O; Leibovitch I; Stolovitch C
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 25595447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Yazici B; Akarsu C; Salkaya M
J AAPOS; 2006 Aug; 10(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 16935232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Al-Faky YH; Mousa A; Kalantan H; Al-Otaibi A; Alodan H; Alsuhaibani AH
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 99(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 25185252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the length of intubation affect the success of treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction?
Komínek P; Cervenka S; Matousek P
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 20305509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double silicone intubation as treatment for persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Mauffray RO; Hassan AS; Elner VM
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 14752310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
