412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21035509)
1. How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: an ERP study.
Tacikowski P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Nowicka A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 21035509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Putting a name to a face: the role of name labels in the formation of face memories.
Gordon I; Tanaka JW
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3280-93. PubMed ID: 21557646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
Marzi T; Viggiano MP
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces.
Martens U; Schweinberger SR; Kiefer M; Burton AM
Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 16872582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r).
Martín-Loeches M; Sommer W; Hinojosa JA
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 15598521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological correlates of forming memories for faces, names, and face-name associations.
Guo C; Voss JL; Paller KA
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 15653290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The faces you remember: caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 21925235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity.
Tanaka JW; Curran T; Porterfield AL; Collins D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1488-97. PubMed ID: 16989550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
Collin CA; Byrne S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
