These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21035855)

  • 1. Making the right conclusions based on wrong results and small sample sizes: interpretation of statistical tests in ecotoxicology.
    Wang M; Riffel M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 May; 74(4):684-92. PubMed ID: 21035855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for a more sensitive earthworm species to be used in pesticide homologation tests - a meta-analysis.
    Pelosi C; Joimel S; Makowski D
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):895-900. PubMed ID: 23084259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
    Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clustering pesticides according to their molecular properties, fate, and effects by considering additional ecotoxicological parameters in the TyPol method.
    Traoré H; Crouzet O; Mamy L; Sireyjol C; Rossard V; Servien R; Latrille E; Martin-Laurent F; Patureau D; Benoit P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):4728-4738. PubMed ID: 29197062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PestScreen: a screening approach for scoring and ranking pesticides by their environmental and toxicological concern.
    Juraske R; Antón A; Castells F; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Int; 2007 Oct; 33(7):886-93. PubMed ID: 17509686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting the best design for nonstandard toxicology experiments.
    Webb JM; Smucker BJ; Bailer AJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Oct; 33(10):2399-406. PubMed ID: 24943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecotoxicology is not normal: A comparison of statistical approaches for analysis of count and proportion data in ecotoxicology.
    Szöcs E; Schäfer RB
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Sep; 22(18):13990-9. PubMed ID: 25953608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The MCRA model for probabilistic single-compound and cumulative risk assessment of pesticides.
    van der Voet H; de Boer WJ; Kruisselbrink JW; Goedhart PW; van der Heijden GW; Kennedy MC; Boon PE; van Klaveren JD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 May; 79():5-12. PubMed ID: 25455888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relevance of sublethal effects in honey bee testing for pesticide risk assessment.
    Thompson HM; Maus C
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Nov; 63(11):1058-61. PubMed ID: 17879982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanomaterials in ecotoxicology.
    Scott-Fordsmand JJ; Krogh PH; Lead JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jan; 4(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 17994909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
    Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
    J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pesticides on the reproductive output of Eisenia fetida.
    Yasmin S; D'Souza D
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 79(5):529-32. PubMed ID: 17891325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical power of non-parametric tests: a quick guide for designing sampling strategies.
    Mumby PJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2002 Jan; 44(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 11883688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QSAR modeling in ecotoxicological risk assessment: application to the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on bees (Apis mellifera L.).
    Hamadache M; Benkortbi O; Hanini S; Amrane A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):896-907. PubMed ID: 29067614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecotoxicity testing of chemicals with particular reference to pesticides.
    Walker CH
    Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jul; 62(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 16671067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What to do with NOECS/NOELS--prohibition or innovation?
    Fox DR; Billoir E; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML; Lopes C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):764-6. PubMed ID: 22987523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RECOTOX, a French initiative in ecotoxicology-toxicology to monitor, understand and mitigate the ecotoxicological impacts of pollutants in socioagroecosystems.
    Mougin C; Gouy V; Bretagnolle V; Berthou J; Andrieux P; Ansart P; Benoit M; Coeurdassier M; Comte I; Dagès C; Denaix L; Dousset S; Ducreux L; Gaba S; Gilbert D; Imfeld G; Liger L; Molénat J; Payraudeau S; Samouelian A; Schott C; Tallec G; Vivien E; Voltz M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Dec; 25(34):33882-33894. PubMed ID: 30022390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on Fox et al. (2012): What to do with NOECs/NOELs.
    Landis WG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):766-7. PubMed ID: 22987524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reluctant comment on Fox et al. (2012): On being dragged into the NOEC squabble.
    Newman MC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):767. PubMed ID: 22987525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.