These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21036009)

  • 1. Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees.
    Unger AS; Duggan JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):855-60. PubMed ID: 21036009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component.
    O'Keefe TJ; Winter S; Lewallen DG; Robertson DD; Poggie RA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 19640673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
    DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.
    Kamath AF; Lee GC; Sheth NP; Nelson CL; Garino JP; Israelite CL
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1390-5. PubMed ID: 21872424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
    Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
    Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless total knee replacement fixation: a contemporary durable solution--affirms.
    Kwong LM; Nielsen ES; Ruiz DR; Hsu AH; Dines MD; Mellano CM
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):87-92. PubMed ID: 25381416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncemented Metal-Backed Tantalum Patellar Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty Have a High Fracture Rate at Midterm Follow-Up.
    Chan JY; Giori NJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2427-2430. PubMed ID: 28341281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years.
    Henricson A; Nilsson KG
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Oct; 87(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 27357222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
    Helm AT; Kerin C; Ghalayini SR; McLauchlan GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):941-4. PubMed ID: 18672343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Ikebuchi M; Iwaki H; Inori F; Nakamura H
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1760-4. PubMed ID: 23642446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Long WJ; Scuderi GR
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 18823749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
    Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histologic retrieval analysis of a porous tantalum metal implant in an infected primary total knee arthroplasty.
    Sambaziotis C; Lovy AJ; Koller KE; Bloebaum RD; Hirsh DM; Kim SJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1413.e5-9. PubMed ID: 22178612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ashour A; Saintmard B; Aubaniac JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Apr; 94(7):638-44. PubMed ID: 22488620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
    You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
    Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of a well-fixed trabecular metal monoblock tibial component.
    Klein GR; Levine HB; Hartzband MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jun; 23(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 18514886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems.
    Peters CL; Erickson JA; Gililland JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):48-53. PubMed ID: 19553076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.