BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21036630)

  • 1. Prospective randomized single-blinded in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of new and reprocessed laparoscopic trocars.
    Mues AC; Haramis G; Casazza C; Okhunov Z; Badani KK; Landman J
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 21036630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of mechanical and in vivo performance of new and reprocessed harmonic scalpels.
    Weld KJ; Dryer S; Hruby G; Ames CD; Venkatesh R; Matthews BD; Landman J
    Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):898-903. PubMed ID: 16698349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues.
    Reichert M
    AORN J; 1993 Mar; 57(3):637-51, 654-5. PubMed ID: 8439132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it safe to reuse disposable laparoscopic trocars? An in vitro testing.
    Chan AC; Ip M; Koehler A; Crisp B; Tam JS; Chung SC
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1042-4. PubMed ID: 11116415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary survey findings. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Cahill N
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10125975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants.
    Steiner MJ; Boler T; Obhai G; Hubacher D
    Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 20103452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
    Voyles CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.
    Roth K; Heeg P; Reichl R
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12165829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endosurgery instruments: reusables vs disposables.
    Patterson D
    OR Manager; 1993 Jan; 9(1):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10123465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: a response to "Is it possible to resterilize disposable laparoscopy trocars in a hospital setting?" Editorial Point and Editorial Counterpoint 10:2, 59-65, (2000).
    Voeller GR
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2000 Oct; 10(5):340-1. PubMed ID: 11083225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-use trocar: is it possible to reprocess it after the first use?
    dos Santos VS; Zilberstein B; Possari JF; dos Santos MA; Quintanilha AG; Ribeiro U
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):464-8. PubMed ID: 18936667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reprocessing. Opened but unused: FDA mulls policy.
    Gearon CJ
    Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Nov; 76(11):14. PubMed ID: 12465577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of decontamination and sterilization of a single-use single-incision laparoscopic surgery port.
    Coisman JG; Case JB; Clark ND; Wellehan JF; Ellison GW
    Am J Vet Res; 2013 Jun; 74(6):934-8. PubMed ID: 23718663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interim guidance for wraps for surgical instrument trays, pending publication of British standard specifications for disposable tray wraps.
    J Sterile Serv Manage; 1988 Aug; 6(2):9. PubMed ID: 10290407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radially dilating trocars are not cost-effective alternatives except for pediatric laparoscopic operations, especially those for undescended testis and imperforate anus.
    Ng WT; Chang D
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Apr; 15(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 11395831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
    Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The microbial and physical quality of recycled gloves.
    Hagos B; Kibwage IO; Mwongera M; Muthotho JN; Githiga IM; Mukindia GG
    East Afr Med J; 1997 Apr; 74(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 9299822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.