These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21037062)
1. The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part II: gliding parallel to a wall. Windsor SP; Norris SE; Cameron SM; Mallinson GD; Montgomery JC J Exp Biol; 2010 Nov; 213(Pt 22):3832-42. PubMed ID: 21037062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall. Windsor SP; Norris SE; Cameron SM; Mallinson GD; Montgomery JC J Exp Biol; 2010 Nov; 213(Pt 22):3819-31. PubMed ID: 21037061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Swimming kinematics and hydrodynamic imaging in the blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Windsor SP; Tan D; Montgomery JC J Exp Biol; 2008 Sep; 211(Pt 18):2950-9. PubMed ID: 18775932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No role for direct touch using the pectoral fins, as an information gathering strategy in a blind fish. Windsor S; Paris J; de Perera TB J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2011 Apr; 197(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 21153731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrodynamic sensing does not facilitate active drag reduction in the golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas). McHenry MJ; Michel KB; Stewart W; Müller UK J Exp Biol; 2010 Apr; 213(Pt 8):1309-19. PubMed ID: 20348343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mexican blind cavefish use mouth suction to detect obstacles. Holzman R; Perkol-Finkel S; Zilman G J Exp Biol; 2014 Jun; 217(Pt 11):1955-62. PubMed ID: 24675558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of the lateral line and vision on body kinematics and hydrodynamic preference of rainbow trout in turbulent flow. Liao JC J Exp Biol; 2006 Oct; 209(Pt 20):4077-90. PubMed ID: 17023602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are fish less responsive to a flow stimulus when swimming? Feitl KE; Ngo V; McHenry MJ J Exp Biol; 2010 Sep; 213(Pt 18):3131-7. PubMed ID: 20802114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial and temporal patterns of water flow generated by suction-feeding bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus resolved by Particle Image Velocimetry. Day SW; Higham TE; Cheer AY; Wainwright PC J Exp Biol; 2005 Jul; 208(Pt 14):2661-71. PubMed ID: 16000536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using computational fluid dynamics to calculate the stimulus to the lateral line of a fish in still water. Rapo MA; Jiang H; Grosenbaugh MA; Coombs S J Exp Biol; 2009 May; 212(Pt 10):1494-505. PubMed ID: 19411543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensing the strike of a predator fish depends on the specific gravity of a prey fish. Stewart WJ; McHenry MJ J Exp Biol; 2010 Nov; 213(Pt 22):3769-77. PubMed ID: 21037055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The lateral line system is not necessary for rheotaxis in the Mexican blind cavefish (Astyanax fasciatus). Van Trump WJ; McHenry MJ Integr Comp Biol; 2013 Nov; 53(5):799-809. PubMed ID: 23722083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model of the lateral line of fish for vortex sensing. Ren Z; Mohseni K Bioinspir Biomim; 2012 Sep; 7(3):036016. PubMed ID: 22585366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow field, swimming velocity and boundary layer: parameters which affect the stimulus for the lateral line organ in blind fish. Teyke T J Comp Physiol A; 1988 May; 163(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 3385668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propulsion efficiency and imposed flow fields of a copepod jump. Jiang H; Kiørboe T J Exp Biol; 2011 Feb; 214(Pt 3):476-86. PubMed ID: 21228207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swimming fish larvae: a computational study. Li G; Müller UK; van Leeuwen JL; Liu H J Exp Biol; 2012 Nov; 215(Pt 22):4015-33. PubMed ID: 23100489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prey fish escape by sensing the bow wave of a predator. Stewart WJ; Nair A; Jiang H; McHenry MJ J Exp Biol; 2014 Dec; 217(Pt 24):4328-36. PubMed ID: 25520384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming II. Effect of swimming speed. Tytell ED J Exp Biol; 2004 Sep; 207(Pt 19):3265-79. PubMed ID: 15326203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What information do Kármán streets offer to flow sensing? Akanyeti O; Venturelli R; Visentin F; Chambers L; Megill WM; Fiorini P Bioinspir Biomim; 2011 Sep; 6(3):036001. PubMed ID: 21670492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. Borazjani I; Sotiropoulos F J Exp Biol; 2008 May; 211(Pt 10):1541-58. PubMed ID: 18456881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]