These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21037164)

  • 1. Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models.
    Johns BT; Jones MN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):662-72. PubMed ID: 21037164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity.
    Fernandino L; Conant LL
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Aug; 201():108939. PubMed ID: 38897450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics.
    Hollis G; Westbury C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1744-1756. PubMed ID: 27138012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models.
    Hollis G
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1350-1370. PubMed ID: 28707176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating word-form representations with global similarity computation in recognition memory.
    Osth AF; Zhang L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1000-1031. PubMed ID: 37973762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.
    Smolka E; Eulitz C
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can prediction-based distributional semantic models predict typicality?
    Heyman T; Heyman G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2084-2109. PubMed ID: 30704340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vector-Space Models of Semantic Representation From a Cognitive Perspective: A Discussion of Common Misconceptions.
    Günther F; Rinaldi L; Marelli M
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(6):1006-1033. PubMed ID: 31505121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics.
    Marelli M; Baroni M
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):485-515. PubMed ID: 26120909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.
    Rodd JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics.
    Durda K; Buchanan L
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Aug; 40(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 18697665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are there mental lexicons? The role of semantics in lexical decision.
    Dilkina K; McClelland JL; Plaut DC
    Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 1365():66-81. PubMed ID: 20869349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition.
    Hoffman P; McClelland JL; Lambon Ralph MA
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Apr; 125(3):293-328. PubMed ID: 29733663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity Judgment Within and Across Categories: A Comprehensive Model Comparison.
    Richie R; Bhatia S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Aug; 45(8):e13030. PubMed ID: 34379325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual inference through global lexical similarity.
    Johns BT; Jones MN
    Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 22253184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation.
    Binder JR; Conant LL; Humphries CJ; Fernandino L; Simons SB; Aguilar M; Desai RH
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2016; 33(3-4):130-74. PubMed ID: 27310469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations.
    Andrews M; Vigliocco G; Vinson D
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):463-98. PubMed ID: 19618982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.
    Vigliocco G; Vinson DP; Lewis W; Garrett MF
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Jun; 48(4):422-88. PubMed ID: 15099798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.