These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21037176)

  • 1. Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.
    Amishav R; Kimchi R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 21037176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G; Avidan G; Ganel T
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Holistic processing does not require configural variability.
    Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):974-9. PubMed ID: 25367141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition.
    Gothard KM; Brooks KN; Peterson MA
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 18787848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces.
    Schwaninger A; Ryf S; Hofer F
    Vision Res; 2003 Jun; 43(14):1501-5. PubMed ID: 12782063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual specialization and configural face processing in infancy.
    Zieber N; Kangas A; Hock A; Hayden A; Collins R; Bada H; Joseph JE; Bhatt RS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Nov; 116(3):625-39. PubMed ID: 23994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic aspects in face perception: evidence from mandatory processing of distractor facial components.
    Anaki D; Nica EI; Moscovitch M
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 20382628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of processing partial information in dynamic face perception.
    Alp N; Lale G; Saglam C; Sayim B
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9794. PubMed ID: 38684721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.
    Tanaka JW; Quinn PC; Xu B; Maynard K; Huxtable N; Lee K; Pascalis O
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Aug; 124():36-49. PubMed ID: 24747157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M; Muramatsu Y; Mizuno S; Kurahashi N; Kurahashi H; Nakamura M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.