222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21037267)
1. Comparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model.
Murphy C; Rooney SJ; Maharaj CH; Laffey JG; Harte BH
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Jan; 106(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 21037267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical vs wire-guided cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion.
Sulaiman L; Tighe SQ; Nelson RA
Anaesthesia; 2006 Jun; 61(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 16704591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a novel cricothyroidotomy introducer in a simulated obese porcine model: a randomised crossover comparison with scalpel cricothyroidotomy.
Yeow C; Greaney L; Foy C; King W; Patel B
Anaesthesia; 2018 Oct; 73(10):1235-1243. PubMed ID: 30006929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of spontaneous and controlled ventilation with various cricothyrotomy devices: a quantitative in vitro assessment in a model lung.
Michalek-Sauberer A; Granegger M; Gilly H
J Trauma; 2011 Oct; 71(4):886-92. PubMed ID: 21399543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a novel Surgicric® cricothyroidotomy device for emergency tracheal access in a porcine model.
King W; Teare J; Vandrevala T; Cartwright S; Mohammed KB; Patel B
Anaesthesia; 2016 Feb; 71(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 26572240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgicric 2: A comparative bench study with two established emergency cricothyroidotomy techniques in a porcine model.
Chrisman L; King W; Wimble K; Cartwright S; Mohammed KB; Patel B
Br J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 117(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 27440636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergency cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of four methods.
Dimitriadis JC; Paoloni R
Anaesthesia; 2008 Nov; 63(11):1204-8. PubMed ID: 19032254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ventilation of a model lung using various cricothyrotomy devices.
Craven RM; Vanner RG
Anaesthesia; 2004 Jun; 59(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 15144301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different methods of ventilation via cannula cricothyroidotomy in a trachea-lung model.
Flint NJ; Russell WC; Thompson JP
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Dec; 103(6):891-5. PubMed ID: 19797248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two open surgical cricothyroidotomy techniques by military medics using a cadaver model.
Mabry RL; Nichols MC; Shiner DC; Bolleter S; Frankfurt A
Ann Emerg Med; 2014 Jan; 63(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24094476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cricothyroidotomy competence and injuries using nonmedical equipment: A crossover noninferiority randomised controlled trial in a porcine cadaver model.
Nabecker S; Hornshaw TA; Greif R; Conrad C; Rohrer M; Theiler L; Riva T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Mar; 38(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 33470688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cricothyroidotomy: comparison of three different techniques on a porcine airway.
Mariappa V; Stachowski E; Balik M; Clark P; Nayyar V
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Nov; 37(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 20014603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bench study comparing between scalpel-bougie technique and cannula-to-Melker technique in emergency cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model.
Chang SS; Tong QJ; Beh ZY; Quek KH; Ang BH
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 71(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 29843506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cricothyreotomy using the Quicktrach coniotomy instrument set].
Frei FJ; Meier PY; Lang FJ; Fasel JH
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1990 Jan; 25 Suppl 1():44-9. PubMed ID: 2310000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of contextualizing a crisis scenario on the performance of a cricothyrotomy procedural task.
You-Ten KE; Wong C; Arzola C; Cheung J; Friedman Z; Perelman S; Siddiqui N
Can J Anaesth; 2015 Oct; 62(10):1104-13. PubMed ID: 26153485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bystander cricothyroidotomy with household devices - A fresh cadaveric feasibility study.
Braun C; Kisser U; Huber A; Stelter K
Resuscitation; 2017 Jan; 110():37-41. PubMed ID: 27810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of a new indicator-guided with a conventional wire-guided percutaneous cricothyroidotomy device in mannequins.
Assmann NM; Wong DT; Morales E
Anesth Analg; 2007 Jul; 105(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 17578970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical approach in difficult airway management.
Helm M; Gries A; Mutzbauer T
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2005 Dec; 19(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 16408538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of execution time and tissue damage by using four ready-to-use percutaneous emergency airway access devices available in Poland].
Burska K; Starosta-Głowińska K; Timler D
Wiad Lek; 2017; 70(6 pt 1):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 29478984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergency Cricothyrotomy Performed by Surgical Airway-naive Medical Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study in Cadavers Comparing Three Commonly Used Techniques.
Heymans F; Feigl G; Graber S; Courvoisier DS; Weber KM; Dulguerov P
Anesthesiology; 2016 Aug; 125(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 27275669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
