109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21037347)
1. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; ; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1527-34. PubMed ID: 21037347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study.
Bosker BH; Ettema HB; Boomsma MF; Kollen BJ; Maas M; Verheyen CC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 22628588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing show little change within one year.
van der Weegen W; Brakel K; Horn RJ; Hoekstra HJ; Sijbesma T; Pilot P; Nelissen RG
Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1626-31. PubMed ID: 24293591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corrosion at the neck-stem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation.
Gill IP; Webb J; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):895-900. PubMed ID: 22733942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Kwon YM; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Beard DJ; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19651827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal-metal reactivity: Houston, we have a problem!
Schmalzried TP; Tiberi JV
Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):647. PubMed ID: 20839676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Shim P; Banga K
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 19553070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: a clinical and pathological study.
Uchihara Y; Grammatopoulos G; Munemoto M; Matharu G; Inagaki Y; Pandit H; Tanaka Y; Athanasou NA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(3):28. PubMed ID: 29516273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Pseudotumour' invading the proximal femur with normal metal ions following metal on metal hip resurfacing.
Krishnan H; Sugand K; Ali I; Smith J
BMJ Case Rep; 2015 Feb; 2015():. PubMed ID: 25670783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.
Lavigne M; Rama KR; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why large-head metal-on-metal hip replacements are painful: the anatomical basis of psoas impingement on the femoral head-neck junction.
Cobb JP; Davda K; Ahmad A; Harris SJ; Masjedi M; Hart AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jul; 93(7):881-5. PubMed ID: 21705557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Glyn-Jones S; McLardy-Smith P; Gundle R; Whitwell D; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Aug; 92(8):1072-8. PubMed ID: 20675749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Mellon SJ; Grammatopoulos G; Andersen MS; Pandit HG; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 25482661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours.
Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Simpson DJ; Kamali A; McLardy-Smith P; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 20190305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Campbell P; Shim P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():148-52. PubMed ID: 17016225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
