These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21038243)

  • 41. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Shifting attention to different levels within global-local stimuli: A study of normal participants and a patient with temporal-parietal lobe damage.
    Filoteo JV; Friedrich FJ; Stricker JL
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2001 May; 18(3):227-61. PubMed ID: 20945212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bimanual coordination and perceptual grouping in a patient with motor neglect.
    Punt TD; Riddoch MJ; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2005 Oct; 22(7):795-815. PubMed ID: 21038277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.
    Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D
    Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hemispheric asymmetries in feature integration during visual word recognition.
    Lindell AK; Arend I; Ward R; Norton J; Wathan J
    Laterality; 2007 Nov; 12(6):543-58. PubMed ID: 17852697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reducing neglect by introducing ipsilesional global cues.
    Maguire A
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):328-32. PubMed ID: 10857719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision.
    Bocanegra BR; Zeelenberg R
    Emotion; 2009 Dec; 9(6):865-73. PubMed ID: 20001129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Shape and motion interactions at perceptual and attentional levels during processing of structure from motion stimuli.
    Miskiewicz A; Buffat S; Paradis AL; Lorenceau J
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):17.1-14. PubMed ID: 19146283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item.
    Luo CR; Caramazza A
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Oct; 57(7):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8532495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Unconscious perception of "extinguished" visual stimuli: reassessing the evidence.
    Farah MJ; Monheit MA; Wallace MA
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(10):949-58. PubMed ID: 1762674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatial and temporal influences on extinction.
    Cate A; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(13):2206-25. PubMed ID: 12417452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Similarity Grouping and Repetition Blindness are Both Influenced by Attention.
    de Haan B; Rorden C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2010; 4():20. PubMed ID: 20300466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Signal detection analyses of repetition blindness.
    Kanwisher NG; Kim JW; Wickens TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Oct; 22(5):1249-60. PubMed ID: 8865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Types and tokens unscathed: a reply to Whittlesea, Dorken, and Podrouzek (1995) and Whittlesea and Podrouzek (1995).
    Downing P; Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Nov; 21(6):1698-702. PubMed ID: 7490582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Identity and similarity in repetition blindness: no cross-over interaction.
    Harris CL; Morris AL
    Cognition; 2001 Aug; 81(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11525479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival of the grouped, or three's a crowd? Repetition blindness in groups of letters and words.
    Jackson A; Buchanan L
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):278-91. PubMed ID: 26415940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Repetition blindness for pseudoobject pictures.
    Arnell KM; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):999-1013. PubMed ID: 9269725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Aphasia and auditory extinction: Preliminary evidence of binding.
    Shisler RJ
    Aphasiology; 2005 Jul; 19(7):633-650. PubMed ID: 16505897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of broken affordance on visual extinction.
    Wulff M; Humphreys GW
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():515. PubMed ID: 26441612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.