These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2103905)
21. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique. Burke FJ; Crisp RJ Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique. Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prosthodontic management of limited oral access after ablative tumor surgery: a clinical report. Cheng AC; Wee AG; Shiu-Yin C; Tat-Keung L J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 11005898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the United Kingdom. Hyde TP; McCord JF J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 10050117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics. Drago CJ J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The 2-minute impression technique. Werrin SR Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 9063231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials. Barghi N; Ontiveros JC Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Using polyvinyl impressions for study models: a case report. Perry R Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):106-7. PubMed ID: 15559460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pameijer CH J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Wastage of a silicone impression material in a general practice setting: a comparison between hand and automixing methods. Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Crisp RJ; Wilson MA SADJ; 2001 May; 56(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 11490695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts. Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]