These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21039134)
1. Using decoy effects to influence an online brand choice: the role of price-quality trade-offs. Hsu HC; Liu WL Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2011 Apr; 14(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 21039134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Menu engineering to encourage sustainable food choices when dining out: An online trial of priced-based decoys. Attwood S; Chesworth SJ; Parkin BL Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104601. PubMed ID: 31953144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of herd cues and product involvement on bidder online choices. Chen YF; Wang YJ Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2010 Aug; 13(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 20712500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of online brand community type on consumer's community engagement behaviors: consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Lee D; Kim HS; Kim JK Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2011; 14(1-2):59-63. PubMed ID: 21329444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty. Marini M; Paglieri F Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():130-141. PubMed ID: 30849515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Building online brand perceptual map. Chiang IP; Lin CY; Wang KM Cyberpsychol Behav; 2008 Oct; 11(5):607-10. PubMed ID: 18785819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 50% off or buy one get one free? Frame preference as a function of consumable nature in dairy products. Li S; Sun Y; Wang Y J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 17955751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A map of decoy influence in human multialternative choice. Dumbalska T; Li V; Tsetsos K; Summerfield C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(40):25169-25178. PubMed ID: 32958673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrapersonal variation in consumer susceptibility to normative influence: toward a better understanding of brand choice decisions. Orth UR; Kahle LR J Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 148(4):423-47. PubMed ID: 18807420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of an online auction's product price and e-retailer reputation on consumers' perception, attitude, and behavioral intention. Wu WY; Huang PC; Fu CS Scand J Psychol; 2011 Jun; 52(3):290-302. PubMed ID: 21332721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introducing of Online Channel and Management Strategy for Green Agri-food Supply Chain based on Pick-your-own Operations. Hu Q; Xu Q; Xu AB Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 31167493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of aging consumers in an e-commerce product choice task: The role of working memory and decision strategies. Rydzewska K; Nielek R; Pawłowska J; Wierzbicki A; Sedek G PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303806. PubMed ID: 38905168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the decoy effect to increase interest in colorectal cancer screening. Stoffel ST; Yang J; Vlaev I; von Wagner C PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213668. PubMed ID: 30913209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consumer demand as a driver of improved working conditions: the 'Ergo-Brand' proposition. Neumann WP; Dixon SM; Nordvall AC Ergonomics; 2014; 57(8):1113-26. PubMed ID: 24840257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Online Shopping Brand Sales Based on IoT Big Data Processing. Zhang M; Ma X Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3833583. PubMed ID: 35378811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social power, product conspicuousness, and the demand for luxury brand counterfeit products. Bian X; Haque S; Smith A Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 24823942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compromise Effect in Food Consumer Choices in China: An Analysis on Pork Products. Wu L; Gong X; Chen X; Hu W Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1352. PubMed ID: 32695046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do information, price, or morals influence ethical consumption? A natural field experiment and customer survey on the purchase of Fair Trade coffee. Andorfer VA; Liebe U Soc Sci Res; 2015 Jul; 52():330-50. PubMed ID: 26004466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the Internet to investigate consumer choice spaces. Crow JJ; Shanteau J; Casey JD Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 12834082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]