These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21039154)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy.
    Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
    Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Majid K; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
    McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra in a multilevel posterior cervical fusion across the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical investigation.
    Gelfand Y; Franco D; Kinon MD; De la Garza Ramos R; Yassari R; Harris JA; Flamand S; McGuckin JP; Gonzalez JL; Mahoney JM; Bucklen BS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Mar; 38(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 36681959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
    Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.
    Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical rigidity of cadaveric cervical spine with posterior versus combined posterior and anterior instrumentation.
    Dahdaleh NS; Nakamura S; Torner JC; Lim TH; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Feb; 10(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 19278327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction after destabilization.
    Bueff HU; Lotz JC; Colliou OK; Khapchik V; Ashford F; Hu SS; Bozic K; Bradford DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 7502135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
    Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
    Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.