BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21039378)

  • 21. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history.
    Heath VC; Southall TR; Souka AP; Novakov A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 9819867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
    Vayssière C; Favre R; Audibert F; Chauvet MP; Gaucherand P; Tardif D; Grangé G; Novoa A; Descamps P; Perdu M; Andrini E; Janse-Marec J; Maillard F; Nisand I;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 16273595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation between lower uterine wall thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasonography and cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in Thai pregnant women.
    Woraboot W; Wanitpongpan P; Phaophan A
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 82(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 30839404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Second trimester cervical length measurements with transvaginal ultrasound: A prospective observational agreement and reliability study.
    Kuusela P; Wennerholm UB; Fadl H; Wesström J; Lindgren P; Hagberg H; Jacobsson B; Valentin L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 32392356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth.
    Berghella V; Roman A; Daskalakis C; Ness A; Baxter JK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17666605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix?
    Rust OA; Atlas RO; Kimmel S; Roberts WE; Hess LW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1060-6. PubMed ID: 15846180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cervical ultrasound assessment for predicting the risk of premature delivery].
    Pietryga M; Brazert J; Wender-Ozegowska E; Mitkowska H; Persona-Sliwińska A; Biczysko R
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2003; 7(3 Suppl 1):157-65. PubMed ID: 15537257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frequency of uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scan.
    Berghella V; Iams JD; Newman RB; Macpherson C; Goldenberg RL; Mueller-Heubach E; Caritis SN; Dombrowski MP;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1253-6. PubMed ID: 15507949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.
    Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15959922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection rate of the cervical gland area during pregnancy by transvaginal sonography in the assessment of cervical maturation.
    Sekiya T; Ishihara K; Yoshimatsu K; Fukami T; Kikuchi S; Araki T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 9819871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability.
    Burger M; Weber-Rössler T; Willmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 9(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 9165682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reference ranges for cervical length by transvaginal scan in singleton pregnancies.
    Silva SV; Damião R; Fonseca EB; Garcia S; Lippi UG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 19895354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in 'at-risk' women.
    Cook CM; Ellwood DA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 10775991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of prolonged pregnancy in nulliparous women by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length at 20-24 weeks and 37 weeks.
    Suh YH; Park KH; Hong JS; Noh JH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Feb; 22(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17297257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.
    Farrell T; Cairns M; Leslie J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 12858303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography.
    Zorzoli A; Soliani A; Perra M; Caravelli E; Galimberti A; Nicolini U
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):960-4. PubMed ID: 7970477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical length at 23 weeks in triplets: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.
    To MS; Skentou C; Cicero S; Liao AW; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 16(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11169343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative Analysis of the Cervical Texture by Ultrasound and Correlation with Gestational Age.
    Baños N; Perez-Moreno A; Migliorelli F; Triginer L; Cobo T; Bonet-Carne E; Gratacos E; Palacio M
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017; 41(4):265-272. PubMed ID: 27509017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study.
    Bergelin I; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 12808672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.