BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21039378)

  • 41. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10-14 and 20-24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery.
    Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O; Erkorkmaz U
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 16682111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short cervix.
    Heath VC; Souka AP; Erasmus I; Gibb DM; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 9819869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound.
    Cook CM; Ellwood DA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jan; 103(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 8608091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in pregnancy.
    Chao AS; Chao A; Hsieh PC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 18935991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix during pregnancy: effect of gestational age and prior vaginal birth.
    House M; O'Callaghan M; Bahrami S; Chelmow D; Kini J; Wu D; Patz S; Bhadelia RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 193(4):1554-60. PubMed ID: 16202756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Usefulness of ultrasonography of the cervical canal in the screening of pregnant women at risk of premature labor].
    Felicetti M; Di Domenico A; Salzano P; Borrelli P; Borrelli M; Laboccetta A; Di Monaco A; Borrelli AL
    Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1 Suppl 1):82-5. PubMed ID: 11526729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sonographic evaluation of uterine cervical dimension within 4-24 weeks of pregnancy.
    Tobechukwu MT; Ose-Emenim IB; Ehinwenma O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2011; 14(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 22248937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reliability of strain elastography using in vivo compression in the assessment of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
    Kwak DW; Kim M; Oh SY; Park HS; Kim SJ; Kim MY; Hwang HS
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):256-265. PubMed ID: 32083451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth.
    Berghella V; Owen J; MacPherson C; Yost N; Swain M; Dildy GA; Miodovnik M; Langer O; Sibai B;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):863-9. PubMed ID: 17400847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Shear-wave sonoelastographic assessment of cervix in pregnancy.
    Duan H; Chaemsaithong P; Ju X; Ho SYS; Sun Q; Tai YY; Leung TY; Poon LC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1458-1468. PubMed ID: 32311770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predictive value of two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of the cervix in preterm labor.
    Rozenberg P; Rafii A; Sénat MV; Dujardin A; Rapon J; Ville Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 12854923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical sonography in preterm labor.
    Iams JD; Paraskos J; Landon MB; Teteris JN; Johnson FF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8008320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical incompetence: the use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis.
    Macdonald R; Smith P; Vyas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 18(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11555448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.
    Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intra- and interobserver agreement on cervical volume and flow indices during pregnancy using transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography and Doppler angiography.
    Basgul A; Kavak ZN; Bakirci N; Gokaslan H
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(6):256-61. PubMed ID: 17566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor.
    Fuchs IB; Henrich W; Osthues K; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 15386604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A prospective comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and digital examination for cervical assessment in the third trimester of pregnancy.
    Lim BH; Mahmood TA; Smith NC; Beat I
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1992; 20(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 1331187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies.
    Airoldi J; Berghella V; Sehdev H; Ludmir J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):553-6. PubMed ID: 16135586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prediction of preterm delivery in the second trimester.
    de Carvalho MH; Bittar RE; Brizot Mde L; Bicudo C; Zugaib M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 15738020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can maternal height predict shorter cervical length in asymptomatic low-risk pregnant women?
    Albayrak M; Ozdemir I; Koc O; Coskun E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 21511388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.