These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21039822)
1. White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. Cope MB; Allison DB Acta Paediatr; 2010 Nov; 99(11):1615-7. PubMed ID: 21039822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. White hat bias: the need for authors to have the spin stop with them. Atkinson RL; Macdonald I Int J Obes (Lond); 2010 Jan; 34(1):83. PubMed ID: 20062107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. White hat bias: examples of its presence in obesity research and a call for renewed commitment to faithfulness in research reporting. Cope MB; Allison DB Int J Obes (Lond); 2010 Jan; 34(1):84-8; discussion 83. PubMed ID: 19949416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Industry sponsorship in research and publishing: who is really to blame for perceived bias? Amsden GW Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):714-6. PubMed ID: 14982974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reverberations of the past or the pitfalls of statistical and data manipulation]. Martin-Du-Pan RC Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(299):1332-3. PubMed ID: 21793426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: an independent voice?: conflicts of interest and research on ethical, legal and social issues. Caulfield T Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):114-6. PubMed ID: 16459424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research dishonesty and conflict of interest. Frizelle F N Z Med J; 2002 Dec; 115(1167):U270. PubMed ID: 12552259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Selective reporting--greater problem than selective publishing?]. Melander H Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 24-30; 102(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 15743133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal. Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Struijs PA; Bhandari M; International Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery Working Group Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17464602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New author guidelines - clinical trials and conflict of interest. Foster A Vet Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 19(2):51. PubMed ID: 18336420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Researchers' links with biomed industry lead to bias in clinical trials. Matthews R New Sci; 2003 Feb; 177(2380):8. PubMed ID: 14587489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The bias busters. Yamey G BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4748. PubMed ID: 25056305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The CLASS study and its scientific statement. Ethical publishing rules neglected]. Wollheim FA Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(40):3934-5. PubMed ID: 12422748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias. Twombly R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):988-90. PubMed ID: 17596566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategies for Addressing a Broader Definition of Conflicts of Interest. McKinney RE; Pierce HH JAMA; 2017 May; 317(17):1727-1728. PubMed ID: 28464167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conflicts of interest may bias research into sugary drinks and obesity. Wise J BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():f7654. PubMed ID: 24385551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publish or be damned. Vines G New Sci; 1997 Sep; 155(2099):53. PubMed ID: 16127834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research. Hammerschmidt D Minn Med; 2008 Jun; 91(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 18616022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]