These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21040690)

  • 1. Clinical aspects of MR colonography as a diagnostic tool.
    Achiam M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Oct; 57(10):B4195. PubMed ID: 21040690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography.
    Achiam MP; Holst Andersen LP; Klein M; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):790-7. PubMed ID: 19375956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Negus R; Gedroyc W; Darzi AW
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):980-9. PubMed ID: 16124980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
    Torres C; Szomstein S; Wexner SD
    Surg Innov; 2007 Mar; 14(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 17442877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy.
    Achiam MP; Løgager V; Chabanova E; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 19041207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance.
    Goehde SC; Descher E; Boekstegers A; Lauenstein T; Kühle C; Ruehm SG; Ajaj W
    Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 15759203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
    Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
    Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
    Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
    Heitman SJ; Manns BJ; Hilsden RJ; Fong A; Dean S; Romagnuolo J
    CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):877-81. PubMed ID: 16217110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [State of the art of MR colonoscopy].
    Lauenstein TC; Rühm SG; Debatin JF
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 12635009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [CT colonography: a new method for detecting colorectal cancer and polyps].
    Ringstad G; Holmquist H; Brabrand K; Aaløkken TM; Hauge T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1470-3. PubMed ID: 16732340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
    Inadomi JM
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
    Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
    Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
    Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
    Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
    Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses.
    Ajaj W; Goyen M; Langhorst J; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Lauenstein TC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 16736477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colorectal cancer imaging.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 2004; 75(3):215-29; quiz 230-2. PubMed ID: 14983592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colon polyps and cancer.
    Bond JH
    Endoscopy; 2003 Jan; 35(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12510223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.